From: Rich Grise on Google groups on
On May 27, 1:00 pm, Joerg <inva...(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:
> Tim Wescott wrote:
> > On 05/27/2010 11:14 AM, Tauno Voipio wrote:
>
> >> A shielded banana plug is called PL 259, also UHF connector.
>
> > By construction that's not really a banana plug -- banana plugs have the
> > spring on the plug, not the socket -- but you've certainly captured the
> > level of sophistication of the PL-259 and its close relatives!
>
> It has been much maligned but I have to say that the PL-259 has always
> been good to me. You can safely get a kilowatt across. Plus banana plug
> fit into the socket, in a pinch.
>
It's easy-peasy to solder it onto a piece of RG-8/U, or RG-58 or -59/
U, with
the adapter.

I stuck a piece of 300-0hm twinlead into one once, to drive my 40M
folded
dipole; the pi-net output of my 75W transmitter tuned up just nice,
and I
made some contacts! (The rest of the family complained about the key
clicks in the [AM] radio, however.) ;-)

Cheers!
Rich
From: Tim Wescott on
On 05/27/2010 01:00 PM, Joerg wrote:
> Tim Wescott wrote:
>> On 05/27/2010 11:14 AM, Tauno Voipio wrote:
>>> Joerg wrote:
>>>> Tim Wescott wrote:
>>>>> I want to make some custom cables for battery testing to plug into my
>>>>> Fluke meter. I'd really rather use the nifty shielded banana plugs
>>>>> like Fluke uses, to reduce the chances of inadvertently frying a
>>>>> battery.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone know a source other than Pomona, which wants an arm and a leg?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't know what an arm and a leg goes for these days, and I've not
>>>> bought anything myself there so far, but here is one vendor:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.testpath.com/Categories/Banana-Plugs-4mm-Shrouded-Straight-In-line-2940.htm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hint for your web searches: The popular term is shrouded banana plug,
>>>> not shielded.
>>>>
>>>
>>> A shielded banana plug is called PL 259, also UHF connector.
>>>
>> By construction that's not really a banana plug -- banana plugs have
>> the spring on the plug, not the socket -- but you've certainly
>> captured the level of sophistication of the PL-259 and its close
>> relatives!
>>
>
> It has been much maligned but I have to say that the PL-259 has always
> been good to me. You can safely get a kilowatt across. Plus banana plug
> fit into the socket, in a pinch.

The only two strikes that I see against it is that (a) it can be hard to
solder correctly, and (b) in light of the performance of a
constant-impedance connector, the term "UHF" is laughable, however much
the connector may have outperformed whatever it replaced.

(b) is just a marketing problem -- the connector works fine at HF.

(a) is just a training problem -- given an iron with enough thermal mass
those things solder up just fine.

--
Tim Wescott
Control system and signal processing consulting
www.wescottdesign.com
From: Joerg on
Tim Wescott wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 01:00 PM, Joerg wrote:
>> Tim Wescott wrote:
>>> On 05/27/2010 11:14 AM, Tauno Voipio wrote:
>>>> Joerg wrote:
>>>>> Tim Wescott wrote:
>>>>>> I want to make some custom cables for battery testing to plug into my
>>>>>> Fluke meter. I'd really rather use the nifty shielded banana plugs
>>>>>> like Fluke uses, to reduce the chances of inadvertently frying a
>>>>>> battery.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone know a source other than Pomona, which wants an arm and a leg?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know what an arm and a leg goes for these days, and I've not
>>>>> bought anything myself there so far, but here is one vendor:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.testpath.com/Categories/Banana-Plugs-4mm-Shrouded-Straight-In-line-2940.htm
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hint for your web searches: The popular term is shrouded banana plug,
>>>>> not shielded.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A shielded banana plug is called PL 259, also UHF connector.
>>>>
>>> By construction that's not really a banana plug -- banana plugs have
>>> the spring on the plug, not the socket -- but you've certainly
>>> captured the level of sophistication of the PL-259 and its close
>>> relatives!
>>>
>>
>> It has been much maligned but I have to say that the PL-259 has always
>> been good to me. You can safely get a kilowatt across. Plus banana plug
>> fit into the socket, in a pinch.
>
> The only two strikes that I see against it is that (a) it can be hard to
> solder correctly, and (b) in light of the performance of a
> constant-impedance connector, the term "UHF" is laughable, however much
> the connector may have outperformed whatever it replaced.
>
> (b) is just a marketing problem -- the connector works fine at HF.
>

I have used them at 430MHz with a substantial amount of power (tens of
watts). Nothing got hot, VSWR was fine.


> (a) is just a training problem -- given an iron with enough thermal mass
> those things solder up just fine.
>

Yes, you need big bertha to do that. 150W is sort of a minimum, I
prefereed a 500W iron for that, it was faster.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
From: Tim Wescott on
On 05/27/2010 03:02 PM, Joerg wrote:
> Tim Wescott wrote:
>> On 05/27/2010 01:00 PM, Joerg wrote:
>>> Tim Wescott wrote:
>>>> On 05/27/2010 11:14 AM, Tauno Voipio wrote:
>>>>> Joerg wrote:
>>>>>> Tim Wescott wrote:
>>>>>>> I want to make some custom cables for battery testing to plug
>>>>>>> into my
>>>>>>> Fluke meter. I'd really rather use the nifty shielded banana plugs
>>>>>>> like Fluke uses, to reduce the chances of inadvertently frying a
>>>>>>> battery.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyone know a source other than Pomona, which wants an arm and a
>>>>>>> leg?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know what an arm and a leg goes for these days, and I've not
>>>>>> bought anything myself there so far, but here is one vendor:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.testpath.com/Categories/Banana-Plugs-4mm-Shrouded-Straight-In-line-2940.htm
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hint for your web searches: The popular term is shrouded banana plug,
>>>>>> not shielded.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A shielded banana plug is called PL 259, also UHF connector.
>>>>>
>>>> By construction that's not really a banana plug -- banana plugs have
>>>> the spring on the plug, not the socket -- but you've certainly
>>>> captured the level of sophistication of the PL-259 and its close
>>>> relatives!
>>>>
>>>
>>> It has been much maligned but I have to say that the PL-259 has always
>>> been good to me. You can safely get a kilowatt across. Plus banana plug
>>> fit into the socket, in a pinch.
>>
>> The only two strikes that I see against it is that (a) it can be hard
>> to solder correctly, and (b) in light of the performance of a
>> constant-impedance connector, the term "UHF" is laughable, however
>> much the connector may have outperformed whatever it replaced.
>>
>> (b) is just a marketing problem -- the connector works fine at HF.
>>
>
> I have used them at 430MHz with a substantial amount of power (tens of
> watts). Nothing got hot, VSWR was fine.
>
>
>> (a) is just a training problem -- given an iron with enough thermal
>> mass those things solder up just fine.
>>
>
> Yes, you need big bertha to do that. 150W is sort of a minimum, I
> prefereed a 500W iron for that, it was faster.
>
I have one that's only 200W or so, but it's HUGE. It takes a long time
to heat up, but the tip is about 3/8" diameter solid copper two inches
long -- so it retains the heat really well, too.

--
Tim Wescott
Control system and signal processing consulting
www.wescottdesign.com
From: Joel Koltner on
"Tim Wescott" <tim(a)seemywebsite.now> wrote in message
news:6KKdneCFgYK3QGPWnZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d(a)web-ster.com...
> The only two strikes that I see against it is that (a) it can be hard to
> solder correctly, and (b) in light of the performance of a
> constant-impedance connector, the term "UHF" is laughable, however much the
> connector may have outperformed whatever it replaced.
>
> (b) is just a marketing problem -- the connector works fine at HF.

Yes, although I believe there are some PL-259s where they mess around with the
insulator's dielectric constant to get it much closer to 50ohms than the usual
ones provide.

> (a) is just a training problem -- given an iron with enough thermal mass
> those things solder up just fine.

Agreed, although in this day and age I kinda think crimping is the better way
to go anyway: Easier and faster to do correctly than soldering.

But everyone certainly *should* solder a few just to get an idea of what the
original ones were like... :-)

---Joel