From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. on 8 Jun 2010 12:00 On Sunday 06 June 2010 08:38:47 Klistvud wrote: > Do you think there would be any point in > optimizing the squid.conf MEMORY CACHE OPTIONS (such as cache_mem, > maximum_object_size_in_memory and memory_replacement_policy), or would > it just "duplicate" the caching provided by the kernel? I mean, aren't > all those objects already being held *in RAM* anyway? If your squid cache size is always smaller than the RAM available to the squid process(es), then I wouldn't worry about it. However, squid is capable of caching much more data than fits into RAM. In that case, you'll want to tweak squid's memory settings so that it appropriately chooses what objects to cache on disk. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. bss(a)iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
|
Pages: 1 Prev: GRUB2 - automatically generating extra entries Next: advice on finding programming help |