From: Chris H on 22 Feb 2010 04:40 In message <TbWdnQDlBcT91x_WnZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d(a)westnet.com.au>, N <N(a)onyx.com> writes > >"RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:4f329b34-41af- >4d92-8b1c-742300101ae3(a)k41g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >> http://a.img-dpreview.com/articles/pma2010/Sneak_Peek/SAM_0745.jpg >> > >How could you trust anything on that page. >Take a look at the last image >http://a.img-dpreview.com/articles/pma2010/Sneak_Peek/ >now, tell me how fake that looks. When did Nikon put the model code >where the focus assist light usually sits? Looks to me like a label stuck on. Suggests it might be a prototype and they used the label to cover a hole where the focus assist usually goes. BTW Some one else mentioned a D800/D900 to me yesterday. However given the rate Nikon are releasing models nothing is a surprise. -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
From: N on 22 Feb 2010 06:12 "Chris H" <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote in message news:znD6vZDaElgLFAyP(a)phaedsys.demon.co.uk... > In message <TbWdnQDlBcT91x_WnZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d(a)westnet.com.au>, N > <N(a)onyx.com> writes >> >>"RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:4f329b34-41af- >>4d92-8b1c-742300101ae3(a)k41g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >>> http://a.img-dpreview.com/articles/pma2010/Sneak_Peek/SAM_0745.jpg >>> >> >>How could you trust anything on that page. >>Take a look at the last image >>http://a.img-dpreview.com/articles/pma2010/Sneak_Peek/ >>now, tell me how fake that looks. When did Nikon put the model code >>where the focus assist light usually sits? > > Looks to me like a label stuck on. Suggests it might be a prototype and > they used the label to cover a hole where the focus assist usually goes. > > BTW Some one else mentioned a D800/D900 to me yesterday. However given > the rate Nikon are releasing models nothing is a surprise. > > > -- > \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ > \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ > \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ > > > I'm amused by the comment under the image suggesting it doesn't look like Photoshop. I think it's the worst PS work I've seen. In fact most of the images on the page look appalling.
From: Chris H on 22 Feb 2010 06:38 In message <jMidnfQnK4Ik-x_WnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d(a)westnet.com.au>, N <N(a)onyx.com> writes > >"Chris H" <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote in message news:znD6vZDaElgLFAyP@p >haedsys.demon.co.uk... >> In message <TbWdnQDlBcT91x_WnZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d(a)westnet.com.au>, N >> <N(a)onyx.com> writes >>> >>>"RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:4f329b34-41af- >>>4d92-8b1c-742300101ae3(a)k41g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >>>> http://a.img-dpreview.com/articles/pma2010/Sneak_Peek/SAM_0745.jpg >>>> >>> >>>How could you trust anything on that page. >>>Take a look at the last image >>>http://a.img-dpreview.com/articles/pma2010/Sneak_Peek/ >>>now, tell me how fake that looks. When did Nikon put the model code >>>where the focus assist light usually sits? >> >> Looks to me like a label stuck on. Suggests it might be a prototype and >> they used the label to cover a hole where the focus assist usually goes. >> >> BTW Some one else mentioned a D800/D900 to me yesterday. However given >> the rate Nikon are releasing models nothing is a surprise. >> > >I'm amused by the comment under the image suggesting it doesn't look >like Photoshop. I think it's the worst PS work I've seen. In fact >most of the images on the page look appalling. I don't think it is photoshop either. IT is what it looks like. A label stuck on over a hole. -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
From: Savageduck on 22 Feb 2010 10:15 On 2010-02-22 01:11:59 -0800, "N" <N(a)onyx.com> said: > > "RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:4f329b34-41af-4d92-8b1c-742300101ae3(a)k41g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... http://a.img-dpreview.com/articles/pma2010/Sneak_Peek/SAM_0745.jpg How > > could you trust anything on that page. > Take a look at the last image > http://a.img-dpreview.com/articles/pma2010/Sneak_Peek/ > now, tell me how fake that looks. When did Nikon put the model code > where the focus assist light usually sits? > Damn! That looks as if it was printed on an address label, trimmed to size and stuck on, without any thought to placement. You would think they might have used a new lens such as the AF-S Micro Nikkor 60mm f2.8 G ED, rather than the AF Micro Nikkor 60mm f2.8 D they have mounted. < http://a.img-dpreview.com/articles/pma2010/Sneak_Peek/SAM_0789.jpg> The really interesting visual twist is the apparent AE Mode button on the side of the prism box, and the missing function button. -- Regards, Savageduck
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Then end of FF bulk? Next: This PMA to be christened the "mock-up" show? |