Simple and direct proof that the theoretical science of AGW is fraud and the product of the host of charlatans led by J Hansen includingno discusion Wormley
in [Physics]
|
From: Sam Wormley on 25 May 2010 10:11 Kent--I'm sure you will appreciate this man's arguments. Franzen - The Chemistry and Physics of Global Climate Change http://hfranzen.org/ http://www.hfranzen.org/Global_Warming.pdf If you find a flaw in the argument, and you are correct, I will let the author know.
From: Sam Wormley on 25 May 2010 10:53 On 5/25/10 9:23 AM, kdthrge(a)yahoo.com wrote: > On May 25, 9:11 am, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > Kent--I'm sure you will appreciate this man's arguments. Franzen - >> > The Chemistry and Physics of Global Climate Change >> > http://hfranzen.org/ >> > http://www.hfranzen.org/Global_Warming.pdf >> > >> > If you find a flaw in the argument, and you are correct, I will let >> > the author know. > Does he point out that without the consideration of the mean root > fouth power, the elementary accounting for 33C rise in average > temperature from naturally occuring 'greenhouse gases', is ultimately > defunct? Did you read his paper? Stefan-Boltzmann Law? Did you?
|
Pages: 1 Prev: testbank&manual solution for any one testbank testbank Next: Infinite vs. instant |