Prev: Need to run old 8051 firmware
Next: I2C communication
From: rowan.bradley on 19 Apr 2010 11:17
For the record, the application I'm trying to debug is written in
assembler, so compiler compatibility is one problem I don't have to worry
about. Of course it would be nice if the debugger could display my
assembler source with all its labels and symbols, instead of hex
addresses...

Rowan

---------------------------------------
Posted through http://www.EmbeddedRelated.com
From: d_s_klein on 19 Apr 2010 14:19
On Apr 19, 8:17 am, "rowan.bradley" <rowan(a)n_o_s_p_a_m.sylvester-
bradley.org> wrote:
> For the record, the application I'm trying to debug is written in
> assembler, so compiler compatibility is one problem I don't have to worry
> about. Of course it would be nice if the debugger could display my
> assembler source with all its labels and symbols, instead of hex
> addresses...
>
> Rowan      
>
> ---------------------------------------        
> Posted throughhttp://www.EmbeddedRelated.com

Google is your friend. Finding the following link too me all of 15
seconds:
<http://www.maxim-ic.com/products/microcontrollers/8051/
development_tools/emulators.cfm>

In the future: Google first, post second.
From: Chris H on 19 Apr 2010 16:17
In message <392dnSgNN5KG6VHWnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>,
rowan.bradley <rowan(a)n_o_s_p_a_m.sylvester-bradley.org> writes
>For the record, the application I'm trying to debug is written in
>assembler, so compiler compatibility is one problem I don't have to worry
>about. Of course it would be nice if the debugger could display my
>assembler source with all its labels and symbols, instead of hex
>addresses...

Then you do have to worry about which compiler.

Besides not all simulators handle anything other than a standard 8051.

Try the Keil that Will handle it.
--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/



From: Chris H on 19 Apr 2010 16:25
In message <8a60fb3e-2893-4470-8bd9-ec793ef1217b(a)c36g2000yqm.googlegroup
s.com>, d_s_klein <d_s_klein(a)yahoo.com> writes
>On Apr 19, 8:17�am, "rowan.bradley" <rowan(a)n_o_s_p_a_m.sylvester-
>bradley.org> wrote:
>> For the record, the application I'm trying to debug is written in
>> assembler, so compiler compatibility is one problem I don't have to worry
>> about. Of course it would be nice if the debugger could display my
>> assembler source with all its labels and symbols, instead of hex
>> addresses...
>>
>> Rowan � � �
>>
>> --------------------------------------- � � � �
>> Posted throughhttp://www.EmbeddedRelated.com
>
>Google is your friend. Finding the following link too me all of 15
>seconds:
><http://www.maxim-ic.com/products/microcontrollers/8051/
>development_tools/emulators.cfm>
>
>In the future: Google first, post second.

Those are emulators. Not simulators. They are also expensive. Also not
all the emulators do a good job with the Dallas parts. They had a
different core timing to most.

The Keil compiler/simulator is one of the few that will handle the
Dallas range properly. The chances are the program was built with the
Kiel tools (they had 80% of the 51 market and were close to Siemens)


--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/



 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Need to run old 8051 firmware
Next: I2C communication