From: Andy on 9 Sep 2005 09:34 "Ken Smith" <kensmith(a)green.rahul.net> wrote in message news:dfqjth$b6d$1(a)blue.rahul.net... > In article <MPG.1d8a9732f331f74a989700(a)news.bright.net>, > Ol' Duffer <DontSend(a)MeSpam.net> wrote: > [...] > Labels added: > > > R1 Ra >>Vin1---RRRR--+---RRRR--+---Iout >> | | >> | |\ R Rb >> | | \ R >> +---|+ \ | >> | >-+ >> +---|- / | >> | | / | >> | |/ | >> | | >>Vin2---RRRR--+---RRRR--+ >> R2 R3 > >>The equations tend to be messy since a portion of load current >>also flows in the feedback, > > If you think of Ra and Rb as one resistor (r4) with a tab at the Iout, the > math is a lot less messy. > > For infinite impedance: > > R1 = R2 > R3 = R4 = K*R1 > > Iout = Vin * K / Ra > > Thanks for that, yes, I did consider the Howland Current pump, but didn't give it too much attention as it apparently has a voltage input, however, rereading my own question, I see that I asked about voltage-current and current-current amps, so the Howland would qualify as a voltage-current amp with a load referenced to zero. I shall look at it again. That only leaves me with a proper single op-amp current-current amp to find! Andy
From: Fred Bloggs on 9 Sep 2005 09:46 >I just found it > a little improbable that these circuits hadn't been invented years ago > by some bright spark, and thought that they weren't shown in my text > books because they were little used. You are talking about a transconductance amplifier, voltage-to-current, they are all smoke and mirrors, and a current-to-current is left as an exercise for the student.
From: Ken Smith on 9 Sep 2005 10:43 In article <43218f71(a)212.67.96.135>, Andy <andrewpreece(a)onetel.com> wrote: Modifies again: >>>Iin1---------+---RRRR--+---Iout >>> | | >>> | |\ R Rb >>> | | \ R >>> +---|+ \ | >>> | >-+ >>> +---|- / | >>> | | / | >>> | |/ | >>> | | >>>Iin2---------+---RRRR--+ >>> R2 R3 [...] >That only leaves me with a proper single op-amp current-current >amp to find! -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: John Woodgate on 9 Sep 2005 11:19 I read in sci.electronics.design that Andy <andrewpreece(a)onetel.com> wrote (in <43218f71(a)212.67.96.135>) about 'Single Op-Amp Current Amplifier', on Fri, 9 Sep 2005: >That only leaves me with a proper single op-amp current-current amp to >find! Ground V1in and leave out R2. Current-current! -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. If everything has been designed, a god designed evolution by natural selection. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
From: jpopelish on 9 Sep 2005 11:42 Andy wrote: (snip) > That only leaves me with a proper single op-amp current-current > amp to find! It doesn't have a ground connected load (but a virtul ground connected load), but an inverting amplifier with no input resistor and the load as the feedbback resistor is a current to current configuration.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: NE602 Primer article? Next: Ferrite bar antenna for car radio? |