From: Anonymous on
In article <1175659085.225433.256230(a)w1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
jeniffer <zenith.of.perfection(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>ps and top have memory requirements .The busybox that I use doesnt
>have ps or top applets compiled into.I know I can compile them into
>it.I use the file /proc/meminfo - the very file ps and top use.kill
>and top come in the Process utilities sections of busybox that can
>very well be compiled to.

And what does any of that have to do with kernel versions?


--
http://www.spinics.net/lists/
From: Ali on
On Apr 3, 3:04 pm, "jeniffer" <zenith.of.perfect...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank u for ur input :)
> I cannot use 2.4 neither ps or top are supported. I would try the
> warnings part though

BUT why? i'm also interested to know like others that what on earth
you cann't use ps with 2.4? what linux port you are trying to use?
You may eliminate the unused drivers that your hardware will never
use. Is mini kernel an option to you?

ali

From: Robert Adsett on
In article <1175745380.977754.323170(a)q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, Ali
says...
> On Apr 3, 3:04 pm, "jeniffer" <zenith.of.perfect...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thank u for ur input :)
> > I cannot use 2.4 neither ps or top are supported. I would try the
> > warnings part though
>
> BUT why? i'm also interested to know like others that what on earth
> you cann't use ps with 2.4? what linux port you are trying to use?
> You may eliminate the unused drivers that your hardware will never
> use. Is mini kernel an option to you?

I think there has been a misunderstanding here. I suspect the OP meant
something more like "I cannot use 2.4 and neither ps or top are
supported (in my setup)."

Robert

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

From: jeniffer on
On Apr 6, 3:21 am, Robert Adsett <s...(a)aeolusdevelopment.com> wrote:
> In article <1175745380.977754.323...(a)q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, Ali
> says...
>
> > On Apr 3, 3:04 pm, "jeniffer" <zenith.of.perfect...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Thank u for ur input :)
> > > I cannot use 2.4 neither ps or top are supported. I would try the
> > > warnings part though
>
> > BUT why? i'm also interested to know like others that what on earth
> > you cann't use ps with 2.4? what linux port you are trying to use?
> > You may eliminate the unused drivers that your hardware will never
> > use. Is mini kernel an option to you?
>
> I think there has been a misunderstanding here. I suspect the OP meant
> something more like "I cannot use 2.4 and neither ps or top are
> supported (in my setup)."
>
> Robert
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com


Thanks Robert. I meant this only. I cannot use ps and top in my
setup .I am not saying anything about the availability/non
availability of ps and top with 2.4 ! I have already applied mini
kernel option. I just want to know of a tool that can give me dynamic
memory usage of an application that cannot be run on background!

From: Ali on
On Apr 9, 5:41 pm, "jeniffer" <zenith.of.perfect...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 6, 3:21 am, Robert Adsett <s...(a)aeolusdevelopment.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > In article <1175745380.977754.323...(a)q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, Ali
> > says...
>
> > > On Apr 3, 3:04 pm, "jeniffer" <zenith.of.perfect...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Thank u for ur input :)
> > > > I cannot use 2.4 neither ps or top are supported. I would try the
> > > > warnings part though
>
> > > BUT why? i'm also interested to know like others that what on earth
> > > you cann't use ps with 2.4? what linux port you are trying to use?
> > > You may eliminate the unused drivers that your hardware will never
> > > use. Is mini kernel an option to you?
>
> > I think there has been a misunderstanding here. I suspect the OP meant
> > something more like "I cannot use 2.4 and neither ps or top are
> > supported (in my setup)."
>
> > Robert
>
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
>
> Thanks Robert. I meant this only. I cannot use ps and top in my
> setup .I am not saying anything about the availability/non
> availability of ps and top with 2.4 ! I have already applied mini
> kernel option. I just want to know of a tool that can give me dynamic
> memory usage of an application that cannot be run on background!

I.C. Cann't understand your point of dynamic memory;-) Do you mean
that what memeory your process will use at runtime?
Anyway, just thought that if you area that much worried about your
memory and kernel size then how about removing the virtual memory
stuff at all. Don't know if its gonna work or not just a thought of
mine. Yeah, using physical addresses, for sure it will make life bit
hard but you maybe able to reduce the size drastically.

ali