From: jr4412 on 22 Feb 2010 05:24 hi > I think you are suggesting that I will have to recompile and then make > changes to syslog.conf based on the recompiling that are different from > the changes shown in the URL. That it is certainly a solution (thank > you) but I am still curious as to why they have a default configuration > makes that necessary. cannot answer 'as to why they have a default configuration makes that necessary'. I did think that you had already recompiled and made changes since your original post read: "I have tried the suggestions at..", I simply pointed out a glaring inconsisteny in the link you provided; anyway, good luck with your 'quest'.
From: nospam on 23 Feb 2010 09:10 In article <c45f22d4-783c-4e40-b903- b12eef64883a(a)f42g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, jr4412(a)googlemail.com says... > hi > > > I think you are suggesting that I will have to recompile and then make > > changes to syslog.conf based on the recompiling that are different from > > the changes shown in the URL. That it is certainly a solution (thank > > you) but I am still curious as to why they have a default configuration > > makes that necessary. > > cannot answer 'as to why they have a default configuration makes that > necessary'. > I did think that you had already recompiled and made changes since > your original post read: "I have tried the suggestions at..", I simply > pointed out a glaring inconsisteny in the link you provided; anyway, > good luck with your 'quest'. > Sorry for the confusion. I meant I had tried the suggestions that indicated they would work without having to recompile. Thanks for your responses.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: awesome on slackware64-current Next: Company dress code with no exceptions! |