Prev: [] Transitivity: how to prove it?
Next: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation proves Atom Totality and dismisses Big Bang Chapt 3 #148; ATOM TOTALITY
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 8 Jun 2010 02:37


Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 5229
> (issue of 28 June 1999)
>
> There is alot about lightwaves that I do not know, as I was reading
> about Slow-Light
> Experiments. I forget how slow the slow light has reached, whether to
> a standstill. Wikipedia
> even has a article about "slow light" and phase velocity.
>
> But my interest in this is whether slow-light can prove or disprove
> that Lightwaves
> have no Doppler shift effect.
>
> Now I would think that if the Doppler shift effect existed for
> lightwaves, that the slowed-light
> in the various recent experiments, that the slowed light would become
> ever more redder
> and redder and redder. That they would start off with white-light and
> as it was slowed down to
> 90 km/sec that the light would be so very much red light, that is if
> the Doppler shift effect
> were true.
>
> But from pictures I have seen of these experiments, it is white light
> going in as input and
> the slowed light output is still white light. If that is true, then it
> appears as though "Slow Light"
> experiments supports a nonexistant Doppler shift.
>

Or maybe I got that turned around backwards, that in slow-light
experiments
and if a Doppler shift effect existed with EM waves, that the slowed-
light
would become more bluer and bluer as it was slowed and slowed down.

But since slow-light is neither blueshifted nor redshifted, signifies
that
no Doppler shift effect exists.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: [] Transitivity: how to prove it?
Next: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation proves Atom Totality and dismisses Big Bang Chapt 3 #148; ATOM TOTALITY