Smartbook for DSP developer ?
in [DSP]
|
Prev: What is the maximum bits-per-symbol possible using FSK on telephone devices?
Next: UGG、Nike dunk high shoes wholesale\retail
From: Roman Rumian on 17 Dec 2009 11:56 Hello, many people like netbooks, but smartbooks are smarter. ;-) The problem (?) is that, as I know, smartbooks cannot run windows OS, neccessary to run my DSP tools (not x86 architecture). Do you use smart/net-books ? Native software tools for smartbooks seem to be also interesting for DSP purposes: ARM Cortex family has high DSP power, is relatively cheap, and extremely well equipped with peripherals. http://beagleboard.org/ What are your opinion ? Regards Roman Rumian
From: Vladimir Vassilevsky on 17 Dec 2009 13:16 Roman Rumian wrote: > Hello, > > many people like netbooks, but smartbooks are smarter. ;-) > The problem (?) is that, as I know, smartbooks cannot run windows OS, > neccessary to run my DSP tools (not x86 architecture). > Do you use smart/net-books ? > Native software tools for smartbooks seem to be also interesting for DSP > purposes: ARM Cortex family has high DSP power, is relatively cheap, and > extremely well equipped with peripherals. > http://beagleboard.org/ > What are your opinion ? Somebody has too much of spare time for nonsense. VLV
From: Roman Rumian on 17 Dec 2009 14:09 Vladimir, W dniu 2009-12-17 19:16, Vladimir Vassilevsky pisze: (...) > Somebody has too much of spare time for nonsense. what is a nonsense ? Using small, leight computer visiting my customers, requesting DSP algorithm tuning ? Or ARM based audio devices ? ;-) Regards Roman Rumian
From: Tim Wescott on 17 Dec 2009 21:12 On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:56:18 +0100, Roman Rumian wrote: > Hello, > > many people like netbooks, but smartbooks are smarter. ;-) The problem > (?) is that, as I know, smartbooks cannot run windows OS, neccessary to > run my DSP tools (not x86 architecture). Do you use smart/net-books ? > Native software tools for smartbooks seem to be also interesting for DSP > purposes: ARM Cortex family has high DSP power, is relatively cheap, and > extremely well equipped with peripherals. http://beagleboard.org/ > What are your opinion ? Linux, Scilab. Post something when you get it all working. -- www.wescottdesign.com
From: Roman Rumian on 18 Dec 2009 03:27
W dniu 2009-12-18 03:12, Tim Wescott pisze: (...) > Linux, Scilab. Post something when you get it all working. Thank you, Tim. :-) I am afraid of non-windows debuggers for Freescale or AD signal processors. Merry Christmas ! Roman Rumian |