Prev: (Update)Opera@USB 10.51
Next: Five Must-Have Chrome Extensions
From: nowhere on 23 Mar 2010 08:14
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:52:04 GMT, Bear Bottoms <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com>
wrote:

>The free antivirus programs Snapfiles lists are:
>
>Panda Cloud Antivirus-not rated
>Microsoft Security Essentials win7-four stars
>Immunet Protect-not rated
>Avast Home Edition-five stars
>Rising Antivirus-four stars
>AVG Antivirus-four stars
>Dr.Web Cureit-three and one half stars
>Avira AntiVir Personal-four stars
>BitDefender-three and one half stars
>Microsoft Security Essentials XP-four stars
>PC Tools Antivirus-four stars
>ClamWin-three and one half stars
>ClamAV/SOSDG-not rated
>ScripTrap-three stars

You mentioned MSE twice. Where is Comodo?
From: za kAT on 23 Mar 2010 08:28
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:19:24 GMT, Bear Bottoms wrote:

> Bear Bottoms <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com> wrote in
> news:Xns9D43C4EDCD8E5bearbottoms1gmaicom(a)69.16.185.247:
>
>> DissidentArmy <dissidentarmy(a)dissidentarmy.invalid> wrote in
>> news:in1gq5dg2hrvnrdqt32hqkm2ajcj51jsoo(a)4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:52:04 GMT, Bear Bottoms <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>The free antivirus programs Snapfiles lists are:
>>>>
>>>>Panda Cloud Antivirus-not rated
>>>>Microsoft Security Essentials win7-four stars
>>>>Immunet Protect-not rated
>>>>Avast Home Edition-five stars
>>>>Rising Antivirus-four stars
>>>>AVG Antivirus-four stars
>>>>Dr.Web Cureit-three and one half stars
>>>>Avira AntiVir Personal-four stars
>>>>BitDefender-three and one half stars
>>>>Microsoft Security Essentials XP-four stars
>>>>PC Tools Antivirus-four stars
>>>>ClamWin-three and one half stars
>>>>ClamAV/SOSDG-not rated
>>>>ScripTrap-three stars
>>>
>>> Who cares, there are sites that are more trusted then snapfiles when
>>> it comes to rating AV's.
>>>
>>> Anyway, you finally managed to find a site that rates the crapware
>>> also known as Rising AntiVirus.
>>> Thread goes in the killfile.
>>>
>>
>> Not at all. Gizmo rates it highly as well.
>>
>
> Oh, and Softsea rates it 5 stars.
>
> CNET users rate it 4 stars.
>
> Tipdownload rates it 5
>
> BestFreewareDownload 4
>
> windows7download 4 1/2
>
> bestsoftwarefordownload 4
>
> download3000 5
>
> qweas 5
>
> brighthub 5
>
> freedownloadcenter 4
>
> softonic 4.5
>
> sofotex 5
>
> spychecker 4
>
> softpedia 5
>
> fyxm 4
>
> top4download editors pick
>
> shareme 5
>
> qweas 5
>
> freewarebb 4
>
> brothersoft 5 editors pick
>
> filehungry 5
>
> bestshareware 5
>
> pcperformancetools 5
>
> filecluster 4 1/2
>
> softgo 5
>
> I mean the list of sites highly rating this software rather exceeds the
> mentality of some in this group. Very narrow minded they are and spout
> about what they don't know about...as most of the detractors here have
> never used it and know nothing about it. Obviously they don't have the
> confidence in themselves to be able to evaluate it for themselves. They
> prefer to depend on flawed tests. Who cares.
>
> Of course, I already knew RISING was better than the other popular
> freeware (if you can call them that) antivirus products. Why? Because I
> installed it and compared it to the other freeware AV's. It is the only
> product I used alone with Windows firewall that didn't allow infections
> on my tests, and in over 2 years of actual use. Only the recent entry of
> MSE rivals it. Not quite yet, but soon to exceed it hopefully. Both are
> better at preventing actual infections than AVAST and AntiVir alone with
> only Windows firewall. How do I know this, from real world hands on use.

I use RAV but for the life of me I don't know why BB rattles on
about it so much. The interface is a bit wanky if you ask me, but it
works well enough. He ought to spend more time shouting his innocence
to the hills of Baton Rouge.

I support Bear Bottoms, I'm starting to like him more and more.

Ari is forging me because he is jealous that I have Pooh and BB as my
friends.
--
zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - www.zakATsKopterChat.com
From: DissidentArmy on 23 Mar 2010 12:24
On 23 Mar 2010 09:40:56 GMT, Gordon Darling <me(a)privacy.net> wrote:


>yada, yada, yada.
>
>
>Snip long, completely useless, list of sites that have zero expertise in
>rating Anti Virus software.
>
Exactly my point, BB can't find a site with proven expertise in rating
Anti Virus software for his little crapware.
From: DissidentArmy on 23 Mar 2010 12:25
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:33:02 -0700 (PDT), Bob Villa
<pheeh.zero(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>On Mar 22, 7:11�pm, DissidentArmy
><dissidenta...(a)dissidentarmy.invalid> wrote:
>
>>
>> Who cares, there are sites that are more trusted then snapfiles when
>> it comes to rating AV's.
>>
>
>If "then" is "than"..."then" when can "than" be used more
>"than"..."then"?
>JK, I know English is your 2nd language! 8^)
>
>bob

Who cares, did you understand what i wanted to say?
And nope, English isn't my 2nd language, more the 4th language ;-)
From: Bob Villa on 23 Mar 2010 12:32
On Mar 23, 11:25 am, DissidentArmy
<dissidenta...(a)dissidentarmy.invalid> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:33:02 -0700 (PDT), Bob Villa
>
> <pheeh.z...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Mar 22, 7:11 pm, DissidentArmy
> ><dissidenta...(a)dissidentarmy.invalid> wrote:
>
> >> Who cares, there are sites that are more trusted then snapfiles when
> >> it comes to rating AV's.
>
> >If "then" is "than"..."then" when can "than" be used more
> >"than"..."then"?
> >JK, I know English is your 2nd language! 8^)
>
> >bob
>
> Who cares, did you understand what i wanted to say?
> And nope, English isn't my 2nd language, more the 4th language ;-)

If it IS your 4th...you do an excellent job, "then"!
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: (Update)Opera@USB 10.51
Next: Five Must-Have Chrome Extensions