Prev: JSF generic/dynamic form ?
Next: Cross Platform/Browser way to send PNG file to Webserver
From: hiwa on 17 Mar 2010 19:52
On Mar 17, 7:50 pm, "Richard Maher" <maher...(a)hotspamnotmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi EJP,
>
> "EJP" <esmond.not.p...(a)not.bigpond.com> wrote in message
>
> news:65Vnn.13412$pv.8699(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> > On 17/03/2010 1:47 AM, Thomas Pornin wrote:
> > > I can confirm. It is true without the buffered streams as well. The two
> > > streams associated with a socket are independent from each other, save
> > > for what happens upon closing either (or the socket itself). But
> > > explicit synchronization is not needed either for that anyway.
>
> > Qualification: if you started with a SocketChannel and got the streams
> > via Channels.newInput/OutputStream, the input and output streams are
> > synchronized internally for some reason, so problems can occur if you
> > try to use them in full-duplex mode. However if you started with a
> > Socket you are OK.
>
> Thanks for the heads-up about SocketChannels but we're using plain Sockets
> so looks like we should be ok.
>
> Thanks again
>
> Cheers Richard Maher

Hi EJP
We'd like you reviving your telekinesis.au site.
We need some files there to see regarding your FNiJ book.
hiwa

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: JSF generic/dynamic form ?
Next: Cross Platform/Browser way to send PNG file to Webserver