From: Darol Klawetter on
Does anyone out there have experience with the Software Communications
Architecture (SCA) world? What do you think of it?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_Communications_Architecture
http://sca.jpeojtrs.mil/
From: Les Cargill on
Darol Klawetter wrote:
> Does anyone out there have experience with the Software Communications
> Architecture (SCA) world? What do you think of it?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_Communications_Architecture
> http://sca.jpeojtrs.mil/

Yes.

I don't think of it anymore. If the answer is CORBA, you must have
asked the wrong question.

--
Les Cargill
From: Darol Klawetter on
On Jan 29, 7:41 pm, Les Cargill <lcargil...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> Darol Klawetter wrote:
> > Does anyone out there have experience with the Software Communications
> > Architecture (SCA) world? What do you think of it?
>
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_Communications_Architecture
> >http://sca.jpeojtrs.mil/
>
> Yes.
>
> I don't think of it anymore. If the answer is CORBA, you must have
> asked the wrong question.
>
> --
> Les Cargill

SCA still seems alive, though I've only done a little reading. It's
not obvious to me that it would result in a lower TOTAL cost of SDR
development as compared to a collection of specific solutions, which
possibly could be created for less than the cost of the development of
such a general framework and the effort of subsequent compliance.

Darol Klawetter