From: JGurtz on 25 May 2010 14:55 A related post in a programing forum is here (with no answer): http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/vsto/thread/61a98015-24a4-472c-a100-37b1e99d4ce4 After upgrading to 2010 recently I have discovered a significant problem in trying to submit spam/ham reports to the Cisco/Ironport automated submission system (they want RFC 822 attachment). Crucialy, they are missing the No matter what method I try (ctrl+alt+f, or drag msg attaching to new msg, or using spamgrabber COM add-in) some Internet headers are being stripped when I forward the message as an attachment. Headers AFTER forwarded: Received: from mxgateway.npumail.com ([192.168.2.10]) by exchgsrv.nputilities.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 18 May 2010 18:19:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Received: from tus1smtoutpex02.symantec.com ([216.10.195.242]) by mxgateway.npumail.com with ESMTP; 18 May 2010 18:18:57 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from tus1opsmtapin02.ges.symantec.com (tus1opsmtapin02.ges.symantec.com [192.168.214.44]) by (Symantec Brightmail Gateway out) with SMTP id C9.4B.27235.F5D03FB4; Tue, 18 May 2010 14:57:52 -0700 (MST) Received: from reserved-155-64-230-18.ges.symantec.com ([155.64.230.18] helo=TUS1XCHECNPIN01.enterprise.veritas.com) by tus1opsmtapin02.ges.symantec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <Chris_Austin(a)symantec.com>) id 1OEUmY-0000F2-7K; Tue, 18 May 2010 14:56:58 -0700 Received: from TUS1XCHEVSPIN04.enterprise.veritas.com ([155.64.230.53]) by TUS1XCHECNPIN01.enterprise.veritas.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 18 May 2010 14:56:57 -0700 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Learn How Symantec spams its customers Webcast. Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 17:58:10 -0400 Message-ID: <1BF6BA633BDC0E48B81213232B41E615A997B6(a)TUS1XCHCLUPIN09.enterprise.veritas.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Learn How Symantec spams its customers Webcast. Thread-Index: Acr2qeWaE/cQLtszSauixh7WqOhtNwACya8w From: "Chris Austin" <Chris_Austin(a)symantec.com> To: "Chris Austin" <Chris_Austin(a)symantec.com> ACTUAL Headers: Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from mxgateway.npumail.com ([192.168.2.10]) by exchgsrv.nputilities.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 18 May 2010 18:19:03 -0400 Subject: Learn How Symantec spams its customers Webcast. Authentication-Results: mxgateway.npumail.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none Received-SPF: None identity=pra; client-ip=216.10.195.242; receiver=npumail.com; envelope-from="Chris_Austin(a)symantec.com"; x-sender="Chris_Austin(a)symantec.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass identity=mailfrom; client-ip=216.10.195.242; receiver=npumail.com; envelope-from="Chris_Austin(a)symantec.com"; x-sender="Chris_Austin(a)symantec.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None identity=helo; client-ip=216.10.195.242; receiver=npumail.com; envelope-from="Chris_Austin(a)symantec.com"; x-sender="postmaster(a)tus1smtoutpex02.symantec.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvQCAHmv8kvYCsPymWdsb2JhbACBPoFVBJoBbxUBAQEBAQgLCgcRIqsgg1ONHYJ1gTFqBINA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,258,1272859200"; d="scan'208,217";a="1861722" Received: from tus1smtoutpex02.symantec.com ([216.10.195.242]) by mxgateway.npumail.com with ESMTP; 18 May 2010 18:18:57 -0400 X-AuditID: d80ac3f2-b7cd2ae000006a63-3a-4bf30d5f67ff Received: from tus1opsmtapin02.ges.symantec.com (tus1opsmtapin02.ges.symantec.com [192.168.214.44]) by (Symantec Brightmail Gateway out) with SMTP id C9.4B.27235.F5D03FB4; Tue, 18 May 2010 14:57:52 -0700 (MST) Received: from reserved-155-64-230-18.ges.symantec.com ([155.64.230.18] helo=TUS1XCHECNPIN01.enterprise.veritas.com) by tus1opsmtapin02.ges.symantec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <Chris_Austin(a)symantec.com>) id 1OEUmY-0000F2-7K; Tue, 18 May 2010 14:56:58 -0700 Received: from TUS1XCHEVSPIN04.enterprise.veritas.com ([155.64.230.53]) by TUS1XCHECNPIN01.enterprise.veritas.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 18 May 2010 14:56:57 -0700 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CAF6D5.03EE53D6" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 14:58:10 -0700 Message-ID: <1BF6BA633BDC0E48B81213232B41E615A997B6(a)TUS1XCHCLUPIN09.enterprise.veritas.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Learn How Symantec spams its customers Webcast. Thread-Index: Acr2qeWaE/cQLtszSauixh7WqOhtNwACya8w From: "Chris Austin" <Chris_Austin(a)symantec.com> To: "Chris Austin" <Chris_Austin(a)symantec.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 May 2010 21:56:57.0277 (UTC) FILETIME=[08FD5ED0:01CAF6D5] X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Return-Path: MAILER-DAEMON(a)mxgateway.npumail.com ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAF6D5.03EE53D6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAF6D5.03EE53D6 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAF6D5.03EE53D6--
From: Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook] on 26 May 2010 08:36 "JGurtz" <JGurtz(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:62FB285D-1E90-474F-ADB3-A37E163F84B0(a)microsoft.com... > No matter what method I try (ctrl+alt+f, or drag msg attaching to new msg, > or using spamgrabber COM add-in) some Internet headers are being stripped > when I forward the message as an attachment. Outlook is simply not good at retaining all the headers and, in particular, the MIME separators. I don't think Outlook retains all of the information in the message store. There's a registry key that may help. See this: http://www.slipstick.com/mail1/viewheaders.htm. Here's some VBA code that may help: http://www.slovaktech.com/code_samples.htm#InternetHeaders. -- Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Deleted emails Next: How can I send an email from an alternate "from" address? |