Some git conversion issues
in [PgSql]
|
Prev: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch
Next: [HACKERS] Solaris Sparc - dblink regression test failure
From: Bruce Momjian on 20 Jul 2010 14:50 Magnus Hagander wrote: > > I have reproduced this by modifying just the CVS tag: > > > > ? ? ? ?$PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/catalog/README,v 1.15 2010/07/20 > > ? ? ? ?18:38:53 momjian Exp $ > > To clarify with what Bruce said on IM to me, the situation is when the > workflow is to manually copy a file from one repo to another before > committing (a working one vs the committer one for example), it may > not be up to date on the version id. Personally this never happens > because I move files by making "cvs diff" in one and applying in the > other, not copying the files. > > For one thing, this showed up in a lot of .po files for 8.1.0RC1. > Peter, can you comment on if this coincides with the tools you use to > do those things? > > > > so it is possible, and can be ignored. > > Yeah, but do we want to? It means a git checkout of the branch tip > will be slightly different - in keywords only - from the previous > checkout in cvs. > Well, we are planning to remove these tags in git anyway, and I don't think anyone cares about those tags not being consistent. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + None of us is going to be here forever. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Peter Eisentraut on 20 Jul 2010 15:14 On tis, 2010-07-20 at 20:46 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > For one thing, this showed up in a lot of .po files for 8.1.0RC1. > Peter, can you comment on if this coincides with the tools you use to > do those things? There are/were some games being played with the key words, so this effect sounds plausible to me. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Peter Eisentraut on 20 Jul 2010 15:15 On tis, 2010-07-20 at 15:12 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Working on the git conversion What's the tool that is being used now? Can you keep us up to date on the options etc. you plan to use? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Magnus Hagander on 20 Jul 2010 15:18
+On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 21:15, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(a)gmx.net> wrote: > On tis, 2010-07-20 at 15:12 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> Working on the git conversion > > What's the tool that is being used now? �Can you keep us up to date on > the options etc. you plan to use? I'm currently running tests with a bunch of different tools, to see which looks best. Right now, it looks like cvs2git is best when we want the keywords included. And yes, I'll definitely post the exact options as soon as I've finished the testruns. -- �Magnus Hagander �Me: http://www.hagander.net/ �Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers |