From: Matt on
On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 09:58:59 -0500, purple wrote:

>On 7/5/2010 9:03 AM, Matt wrote:
>> On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:36:44 +0300, Aatu Koskensilta wrote:
>>
>>> Matt<30days(a)net.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 05:39:36 -0700 (PDT), Don Stockbauer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Now, if you want to go the road Cantor did and waste your life
>>>>> exploring the infinity of mathematical infinites and then commit
>>>>> suicide over them, be my guest.
>>>>
>>>> No suicide mentioned here:
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Cantor
>>>
>>> It was suicide by heart attack.
>>
>> Strange humor.
>>
>> http://plus.maths.org/issue47/features/macgregor/index.html
>> His last letters are to his wife Vally, written from a mental
>> hospital, pleading to be allowed home. He died of a heart attack on
>> the 6th of January 1918.
>>
>> Sad.
>
>Why? He'd be dead by now anyway.

The conditions at and type of death are irrelevant?

Would you say it doesn't matter that Lincoln was assassinated because
he'd be dead now anyway?

Are you sure that the USA might not be just a little better today if
the first presidential assassination hadn't happened?
From: purple on
On 7/5/2010 12:19 PM, Matt wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 09:58:59 -0500, purple wrote:
>
>> On 7/5/2010 9:03 AM, Matt wrote:
>>> On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:36:44 +0300, Aatu Koskensilta wrote:
>>>
>>>> Matt<30days(a)net.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 05:39:36 -0700 (PDT), Don Stockbauer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Now, if you want to go the road Cantor did and waste your life
>>>>>> exploring the infinity of mathematical infinites and then commit
>>>>>> suicide over them, be my guest.
>>>>>
>>>>> No suicide mentioned here:
>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Cantor
>>>>
>>>> It was suicide by heart attack.
>>>
>>> Strange humor.
>>>
>>> http://plus.maths.org/issue47/features/macgregor/index.html
>>> His last letters are to his wife Vally, written from a mental
>>> hospital, pleading to be allowed home. He died of a heart attack on
>>> the 6th of January 1918.
>>>
>>> Sad.
>>
>> Why? He'd be dead by now anyway.
>
> The conditions at and type of death are irrelevant?

I don't live in the past. YMMV

> Would you say it doesn't matter that Lincoln was assassinated because
> he'd be dead now anyway?

At this point in time, it no longer matters.

> Are you sure that the USA might not be just a little better today if
> the first presidential assassination hadn't happened?

Is the US any better off today because the assassination attempts
on President Andrew Jackson failed? Are you aware that there have
been many such attempts? Are we better off today because they
failed?

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_assassination_attempts_and_plots>
From: BURT on
On Jul 4, 11:42 pm, Marshall <marshall.spi...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 4, 10:37 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 4, 10:34 pm, Marshall <marshall.spi...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 4, 9:25 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > A quantum fluctuation that produces light waves instead of matter..
>
> > > > Wouldn't that be actual light, not virtual light?  And quantum fluct-
> > > > you-Asians can produce what type of matter?
>
> > > 1. Actual.
>
> > > 2. Potential.
>
> > > Marshall
>
> > Einsteinian math can be used to define the speed of light limit in the
> > universe. It is E=MC Squared and the Gamma factor but they are solved
> > for C instead.
>
> > Factoring this Einsteinian math reveals a new mathematical truth of
> > the speed of light.
>
> Duh, that's what I said.
>
> Marshall- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

No you didn't. Try again.


Mitch Raemsch
From: purple on
On 7/5/2010 1:51 PM, BURT wrote:
> On Jul 4, 11:42 pm, Marshall<marshall.spi...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 4, 10:37 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 4, 10:34 pm, Marshall<marshall.spi...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> On Jul 4, 9:25 pm, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> A quantum fluctuation that produces light waves instead of matter.
>>
>>>>> Wouldn't that be actual light, not virtual light? And quantum fluct-
>>>>> you-Asians can produce what type of matter?
>>
>>>> 1. Actual.
>>
>>>> 2. Potential.
>>
>>>> Marshall
>>
>>> Einsteinian math can be used to define the speed of light limit in the
>>> universe. It is E=MC Squared and the Gamma factor but they are solved
>>> for C instead.
>>
>>> Factoring this Einsteinian math reveals a new mathematical truth of
>>> the speed of light.
>>
>> Duh, that's what I said.
>>
>> Marshall- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> No you didn't. Try again.

Go to the Ford Theater.
From: BURT on
On Jul 5, 11:59 am, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote:
> On 7/5/2010 1:51 PM, BURT wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 4, 11:42 pm, Marshall<marshall.spi...(a)gmail.com>  wrote:
> >> On Jul 4, 10:37 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com>  wrote:
>
> >>> On Jul 4, 10:34 pm, Marshall<marshall.spi...(a)gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> >>>> On Jul 4, 9:25 pm, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com>  wrote:
>
> >>>>>> A quantum fluctuation that produces light waves instead of matter.
>
> >>>>> Wouldn't that be actual light, not virtual light?  And quantum fluct-
> >>>>> you-Asians can produce what type of matter?
>
> >>>> 1. Actual.
>
> >>>> 2. Potential.
>
> >>>> Marshall
>
> >>> Einsteinian math can be used to define the speed of light limit in the
> >>> universe. It is E=MC Squared and the Gamma factor but they are solved
> >>> for C instead.
>
> >>> Factoring this Einsteinian math reveals a new mathematical truth of
> >>> the speed of light.
>
> >> Duh, that's what I said.
>
> >> Marshall- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > No you didn't. Try again.
>
> Go to the Ford Theater.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

You can solve Einstein's math for C. It gives a mathematical way of
viewing the universal speed limit of light.

Mitch Raemsch