Prev: Wireless N
Next: BeatScape Record
From: Ricky Hunt on 1 Jan 2010 02:04 I can't tell from the language on the download page what exactly it means. It says you can install 8.5.2 to 8.5 or 8.5.1. Does this mean if you install 8.5.2 you don't have to install 8.5.1 (meaning 8.5.1 is included in 8.5.2) or do you have to install 8.5.1 also? This is the first time I recall doing an update that has this option. -- Thanks, Ricky Hunt
From: John Braner on 1 Jan 2010 06:18 Ricky Hunt wrote: > I can't tell from the language on the download page what exactly it means. > It says you can install 8.5.2 to 8.5 or 8.5.1. Does this mean if you install > 8.5.2 you don't have to install 8.5.1 (meaning 8.5.1 is included in 8.5.2) > or do you have to install 8.5.1 also? This is the first time I recall doing > an update that has this option. > Ricky, I just went through this last week. I just installed the 8.5, then 8.5.2 and it's fine. -- =========== John Braner jbraner(a)NOblueyonderSPAM.co.uk http://cdbaby.com/cd/JohnBraner http://www.soundclick.com/johnbraner
From: Ricky Hunt on 1 Jan 2010 12:45 "John Braner" <me(a)myhouse.com> wrote in message news:hhklml$vhl$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > Ricky Hunt wrote: >> I can't tell from the language on the download page what exactly it >> means. It says you can install 8.5.2 to 8.5 or 8.5.1. Does this mean if >> you install 8.5.2 you don't have to install 8.5.1 (meaning 8.5.1 is >> included in 8.5.2) or do you have to install 8.5.1 also? This is the >> first time I recall doing an update that has this option. >> > > Ricky, > I just went through this last week. I just installed the 8.5, then 8.5.2 > and it's fine. Thanks!
From: Sue Morton on 2 Jan 2010 02:27 Sonar updates have always looked like lazy programming to me... It's far simpler to write a patch that only updates one revision :-) -- Sue Morton "Russ B" <ElmSTUPIDITYertfudd(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Xns9CF3ABCAF8658notverybrightguy(a)198.186.192.200... > I would think that was to limit the size of the downloads like back in the > dial-up days. Something most of the software vendors have abandoned these > days. Check the size of NI and Sony downloads-you're downloading the > entire program every time. I guess Cakewalk wanted to avoid that with > incremental updates. Now they don't care. <shrug>
From: Sue Morton on 2 Jan 2010 11:32
Makes a great case for taking an OS image before installing anything Sonar :-) -- Sue Morton "Glennbo" <vdrumsYourHeadFromYourAss(a)cox.net> wrote in message news:Xns9CF467D3C8457BrownShoesDontMakeIt(a)69.16.185.250... > In news:hhmsi2$9rl$1(a)appyface.eternal-september.org the killer robot > "Sue Morton" <867-5309(a)domain.invalid> grabbed the controls of the > spaceship cakewalk.audio and pressed these buttons... > >> Sonar updates have always looked like lazy programming to me... It's >> far simpler to write a patch that only updates one revision :-) > > And if the new patch breaks something important, simply uninstall > everything, delete ten registry keys, install version x.00, follow it with > the x.01 update, then the x.02 update, and finally the x.03 update to get > back where you were before installing the newest update. ;) |