Sony crushes the price/build-quality barrier
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Movado Certa Ladies Watch 0605616
Next: Here Comes the 3-D Camera: Revolutionary Prototype Films World in Three Dimensions
From: GM1925 on 13 May 2010 09:55 "RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:6c223cef-8c4a-4746-860d-ae4cacc74f7c(a)b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > Metal bodies! At low prices! With APS sensors! > > http://dpreview.com/previews/sonynex5/page2.asp It doesn't create a solution to an existing problem. The problem with SLR's are that they are too big and bulky to carry around all the time, although they serve their purpose. The problem with P&S are that they are too slow, low burst/buffer, slow AF, poor noise control, etc. but they serve their purpose. With EVIL, I can't see how it creates any solution. Am I wrong?
From: nospam on 13 May 2010 09:58 In article <VPednY-Cicp9mXHWnZ2dnUVZ7qSdnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, GM1925 <abc(a)xyz.co.me> wrote: > The problem with SLR's are that they are too big and bulky to carry around > all the time, although they serve their purpose. The problem with P&S are > that they are too slow, low > burst/buffer, slow AF, poor noise control, etc. but they serve their > purpose. > > With EVIL, I can't see how it creates any solution. Am I wrong? yes.
From: GM1925 on 13 May 2010 10:12 "nospam" <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:130520100958453206%nospam(a)nospam.invalid... > In article <VPednY-Cicp9mXHWnZ2dnUVZ7qSdnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, GM1925 > <abc(a)xyz.co.me> wrote: > >> The problem with SLR's are that they are too big and bulky to carry >> around >> all the time, although they serve their purpose. The problem with P&S >> are >> that they are too slow, low >> burst/buffer, slow AF, poor noise control, etc. but they serve their >> purpose. >> >> With EVIL, I can't see how it creates any solution. Am I wrong? > > yes. If I need a bag to carry it, then why not just carry an SLR?
From: nospam on 13 May 2010 10:16 In article <7fmdnfrpdalOlXHWnZ2dnUVZ8qKdnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, GM1925 <abc(a)xyz.co.me> wrote: > If I need a bag to carry it, then why not just carry an SLR? because you don't necessarily need a bag (it's quite small with a pancake lens) and an slr is bigger and heavier.
From: GM1925 on 13 May 2010 10:44
"nospam" <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:130520101016437923%nospam(a)nospam.invalid... > In article <7fmdnfrpdalOlXHWnZ2dnUVZ8qKdnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, GM1925 > <abc(a)xyz.co.me> wrote: > >> If I need a bag to carry it, then why not just carry an SLR? > > because you don't necessarily need a bag (it's quite small with a > pancake lens) and an slr is bigger and heavier. If that's the market they are going after, then surely they would have developed a greater range of decent prime lenses prior to launch? It strikes me as they are not really sure where they are going with this. At the moment, they are not competing with SLR's, they are not competing with P&S's, they are not competing with camera phones and they are not competing with Leica M-Series. Maybe they know something I don't? |