From: krw on
On Thu, 6 May 2010 20:09:14 -0700, DaveC <invalid(a)invalid.net> wrote:

>>> Why?
>
>> Probably trying to use it in an existing design. Parts like this seem to
>> vary pretty widely on mechanical layout.
>
>Yes. Because of existing electrical interface & mechanical mounting. Could
>re-engineer, but easiest / quickest is to replace with identical unit.

The electrical interfaces, at least of the models I've used, are identical.
Mounting varies somewhat across models, but it's close enough that a one-off
should be possible.
From: DaveC on
The original p/n is CESI-32/VS, 32 detents per revolution.

Dave