From: Rich on 13 Feb 2010 16:13 http://copyrightaction.com/forum/uk-gov-nationalises-orphans-and-bans-non- consensual-photography-in-public
From: bnb on 14 Feb 2010 15:19 "Rich" <none(a)nowhere.com> wrote in message news:xrydnT2jR8BuiOrWnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... > http://copyrightaction.com/forum/uk-gov-nationalises-orphans-and-bans-non- > consensual-photography-in-public Ebay are already planning it: http://sellerupdate.ebay.co.uk/april2010/catalogue-photos.html This should be opt in, not opt out. Did you receive an email informing you of these changes? Anyway, copyright is still copyright.
From: bnb on 14 Feb 2010 15:34 "Rich" <none(a)nowhere.com> wrote in message news:xrydnT2jR8BuiOrWnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... > http://copyrightaction.com/forum/uk-gov-nationalises-orphans-and-bans-non- > consensual-photography-in-public Lets not forget: "...provides Ofcom with additional powers in relation to electromagnetic spectrum access" Errr?
From: Grimly Curmudgeon on 14 Feb 2010 20:58 We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold. I remember Rich <none(a)nowhere.com> saying something like: >http://copyrightaction.com/forum/uk-gov-nationalises-orphans-and-bans-non-consensual-photography-in-public Dirty, lousy bastards! The stench of corruption emanating from that is overwhelming.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: World Press photo winners, some good, some lousy Next: Nikon falling behind in the entry level |