Prev: CHAMBER POT
Next: deriving speed of light out of just pure mathematics; 2nd attempt #578 Correcting Math
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 9 Apr 2010 02:28


Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(snipped)
>
> More tonight.
>
> P.S. Also, I have been asking for some confirmation that Planck's unit
> of 10^500
> for the Coulomb Interactions is related to the speed of light. I have
> been asking
> for some confirmation, and I finally have it. In the Plutonium Atom
> Totality, the
> number "pi" comes from 22 subshells divided by 7 shells. The number
> "e" comes
> from only 19 subshells occupied. So that 22 is the maximum number and
> the analog
> of the largest Planck unit number. So what is 22^22^22, or 22^484
>

Starting where I left off earlier today. We get the mass ratio of
proton to electron
as 6(pi^5) which comes from the Plutonium Atom Totality of 5f6, of 6
electrons
in the 5th energy level. We get the Inverse Fine Structure Constant as
(pi^7)/22
from the Plutonium Atom Totality from the maximum shells of 7 energy
levels.
So the exponent is the energy level or shell level. And since there
are 22 subshells
and 22 is the largest number with these shells and subshells, that the
largest
Finite Number in both Physics and mathematics should involve the
number 22.

So what is 22^22 as that of the 22nd energy level. And looking up this
number it is

22^22 = 3.41427877 × 10^29

And to me, it is not a coincidence that the Luminet Poincare
Dodecahedral Space finds
the Cosmos to be 10^28 cm diameter.

Earlier I wrote 22^22^22 which is a huge number, but the Atom Totality
theory seems to
only use energy levels of singular exponents such as 22^22. But I
suppose the Atom
Totality theory can use 22^(22*22) which is 22^484 and is close to the
10^500 of the
Planck unit of Coulomb Interactions inside element 109.

So if proton to electron mass ratio is 6(pi^5) and inverse fine
structure constant
is (pi^7)/22, then 22^22 must have some physical significance also,
and related to
the speed of light.

Now there is a Planck length of around 1.6 x 10^-35 meters. So I need
someway of getting
rid of units. Planck length is begot from speed of light, Planck
constant and gravitational
constant. Trouble with this is that I want to derive the speed of
light and here I would
be using it.

So if I assume that 22^22 is time in seconds which would be 3 x 10^29
seconds. And reverse
the Planck length for the Cosmic length, since we are speaking of an
Atom Totality
so that we have this situation: 1.6 x 10^35 m / 3.4 x 10^29 sec, and
here I get a speed
of 3 x 10^7 meters/sec. Which is very close but the speed of light is
3 x 10^8 m/s

What I am doing is using the Planck length to get rid of the units.
The only reservation for
me, is that I am using the speed of light to derive the speed of light
and this bothers me
somewhat.

Comment on post earlier today: that is probably the best way to teach
the theory of
Special Relativity as to how a speed can be always a constant, no
matter what the
frame of reference. Is to show that the circle of circumference
divided by diameter
is a constant, no matter what circle in Euclidean geometry is
involved. So "pi" is the
analog of speed of light, only that pi is in Euclidean geometry and
the speed of light
is in the Elliptic unioned Hyperbolic geometry.


Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: CHAMBER POT
Next: deriving speed of light out of just pure mathematics; 2nd attempt #578 Correcting Math