Prev: deriving speed of light out of just pure mathematics; 2nd attempt #580 Correcting Math
Next: deriving speed of light out of just pure mathematics; 2nd attempt #581 Correcting Math
From: Jesse F. Hughes on 9 Apr 2010 14:34
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes(a)gmail.com> writes:

> But I suppose the Atom Totality theory can use 22^(22*22) which is
> 22^484 and is close to the 10^500 of the Planck unit of Coulomb
> Interactions inside element 109.

Unless I made a stupid error, 22^484 is closer to 10^650. That's not
very close to 10^500, is it?

--
Jesse F. Hughes "Just tell me this.
Is this all there is?
After all that fuss about us,
Is this all there is?" -- Webb Wilder
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: deriving speed of light out of just pure mathematics; 2nd attempt #580 Correcting Math
Next: deriving speed of light out of just pure mathematics; 2nd attempt #581 Correcting Math