Prev: The fate of the Earth?
Next: Solution Manual Intermediate Accounting 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
From: AliveAndHuman on 3 Sep 2009 02:52
**Tell me who you are with, and I will tell you who you ARE** - This
popular phrase has an occult meaning derived from the telepathic
channel. It is an example of crossed messages. If this man X is
thinking of or sending a message to N, who will get the message? NOT N
if it can hear, because the image of N in his own mind and the target
s image in X are dissimilar. Who has the same image of N in mind? M, N
s company. X and M have the same perspective of N, while N only knows
himself from mirrors, at best. In some cases N would even have the
image of Z in mind, anyone, as being himself! So to make the message
arrive, X has to think of M who is with N, not of N. M is the who you
are with, N is the who you ARE. The message m is anchored by M who is
in the mind of N. if N is schizophrenic, it will hear the message; if
N is not schizophrenic the message will bounce on his mind and X will
know WHO is N! N can be localized by thinking at his company! Note
that the ability to perceive the message and the actual brain
processing field that carries the transmission are different concepts
but vary together and in relation to M, so more than one bounce is
possible. For N to be fully identified both M and N would be producing
carrying fields so the signal is bounced on N as M s brain recognizes
(anchors) the message and projects it on N s person (the mind content
of both X and M) who in turn also bounces the signal as it is
transmitted from M thinking at N. This is important for psychics! If
they have a picture of N... whatever they think (assuming they do have
the power to transmit and conditions are adequate) would not be picked
up by N but by whatever M is with N, and M may be very
schizophrenic... making sense of the usual meaning of this common
phrase: being with a *bad* person makes you dangerous for people
thinking you... even if **the you the lion are not as fierce as you
are described** (el leon no es tan malo como lo pintan).

We can define crazy as people who take decisions based on signals in
the telepathic channel they themselves emit and perceive bounced on
other people or things. Crazy thus has a component of autonomy that
differentiates it from the true psychopath, for whom compulsiveness is
such an important component that it loses autonomy, though the
existence of the bounced signal can turn the crazy person into a
psychopath making boundaries between both concepts blurr. If a crazy
man becomes obssessed with acting about the bounced signal, it turns
into a psychopath. Note that there is no guarantee _anybody else_ can
hear the signal emitted by any particular individual so strictly
speaking no assumptions can be made as to who received the message if
at all, what matters is that one person CAN hear his own thought
reflected elsewhere and he acts on it. The acts of the crazy person
will be considered *crazy* as this signal can be so private people
around him cannot understand the source for his decisions and acts.
This is the case, for instance, of psychics who use their ability to
localize people or things. This psychic bounces his signal on an old
furniture belonging to his greatfather, then insists he has go into
the place. That psychic leaves all his chores undone and runs to see
who is bouncing the signal, but wouldnt say why he runs. In the
extreme crazy people begin killing to shut up the signal because they
can hear themselves over other people s heads. Another example would
be demolishing companies interested in having certain places
demolished because one employee, probably the owner himself, is
hearing itself in the place. Also some jobs would grant obvious
opportunities for crazy people, like janitorial services or
journalism. Craziness becomes important for society and a disease if
the crazy person begins destroying the reflector of his thought, as
what would determine this reflection is a series of complex
interactions. Particularly, the assumption that it can be heard by
just anyone is not supported by reality; most likely it is a private
experience or it is shared by direct relatives or people who know them
for a long time...

The city is going sour on sweet is the headline. So... can excrement
color anthropoids enjoy sweetness, can they actually _taste_ it? If
they cannot taste sweetness only humans would care if all sweetness
sources dissappear from Earth! In that case sugar would have a strange
taste and would not be a joy but rather a pain or a duty to use to
hide the *secret* (schizophrenic trait). This would be an important
element in the *crossed* programming of white blacks as they would
consider it important to be *savory* people or *sour* people and not
*sweet* people. It would also make sugar a natural substance to mix
with poisons or *experiments*, as excrement color anthropids would
naturally avoid it or not use it. It is noticeable that in shelters
people would fight to have *seconds*, a second meal, but not a second
drink of water nor more sweet bread.

Danilo J Bonsignore
From: AliveAndHuman on 3 Sep 2009 05:10
Oh yes! This musician (not I), thinks he is very good but he is the
color of excrement and cannot understand. It is like changing one
tooth from a key, it fits the lock but the door will not open. It is
that he does not understand he lacks the *feeling*, the EMOTION
transmitted by human players. Music is the multiple key to open
multiple doors through one single lock. That is its meaning! This new
key is so shaped that it opens a door not previously seen, when it is
played... If the key is blunt, it will open the only and same door
but nothing to be discovered there.

Humans have a very complex emotional life derived (partially) from
solving the basic problem of discerning the self from the mother.
Having solved the problem of excrement, the baby disposes of more
resources to develop emotional life and different forms of social
relation to other human beings. Those same resources would be used to
develop language, as it is necessary to express more complex patterns
of feeling and communicate them in a social system. This would be true
also of music. Hence language develops not only from the need to refer
to the *non natural* color of human beings for which the best referent
is the (original) environment and this need a better tag, but also to
make internal states known by others. This same need to communicate
emotional life was determinant in the evolution of features as a quick
way to communicate, before words are spoken and on sight meeting
communication efficiency requirements, emotional contents that would
not be readily apparent from mere physical acts. This learning of
emotion and language in babies for whom excrement is not a problem is
similar to the learning of the sensation map distinguishing the body
from the environment and would be exemplified also by the *grip* test
of babies aware of themselves vs babies whose perception of their own
body is impaired. Note that assuming the direct link between
difficulty to discern body, mother and excrement AND schizophrenia,
excrement color populations AND schizophrenics would have less chance
to learn complex emotional gamuts since they would tend to *normalize*
and equilibrate on the common-ly felt emotion or the strongest
transmitter s emotion...

Danilo J Bonsignore
From: AliveAndHuman on 3 Sep 2009 06:16
I would go seriously discussing... no, Rerum Novarum is excrement.
Period.

Danilo J Bonsignore
From: AliveAndHuman on 3 Sep 2009 07:25
No Buho (OWL, programming library, I was already programming, I was
known by that name? And it was NO whatever)
U(no) (ended being heard as U, anyone, universe)
e mat(o) (Valero s brother nickname, seemingly Hindi; they would think
it was Mato composing, so he ended cretin)
su (musica) (his music, last word was not heard, maybe somebody
defending me or who exactly?)

The man got his name from a schizophrenic stream as it matched either
Spanish or Japanese... or bilingual people in those languages, before
normal and above normal people begun falling to the mass of
schizophrenics who cannot understand the more people they *dismiss*
the more they hear... (can be formalized quite well).

It all gives me the impression three policemen, two Mexican maid
looking ones and one mixed race being VERY distressed in a table, have
just come out of the Empire State from killing somebody who was near
and dear to me, as the drivers in the truck told me. THEIR excuse is
that **it was being heard over her head** and *this is the devil who
dares criticize the Pope*. The policeman looks like a monkey but big
size, the policewoman sounds like a castrated man and the other one
like a Peruvian Indian also castrated. Both have signs of brain
damaged caused by schizophrenic techniques.

Danilo J Bonsignore
From: Fabrizio J Bonsignore on 5 Sep 2009 22:31
No time to prove it, but it doesnt matter, right? if any word is
believed... so take it as a whole hypothesis. We already had two
extreme solutions, one left behind gorillas as the African solution
where only body matters, and chimpancess as the European solution
where face is what matters and chimpancees DO mock the human face
expresiveness, dont they? These two would be the total equilibrium
points for two previous conflicts in which each side won. Messages
cross, so Europeans left behind impressive chested gorillas for those
who selected (evolutionary) for body-chest, and Africans left behind
chimpancess (han-umans) for those who selected (evolutionary) for
expressive faecs. And maybe red haired orangutans for very appeased
and placid natured red haired people? A single mutation (search,
drift) trait making them evident and taken to the extreme by
**social** selection, for us to consider later (now) as collateral
branches of the human tree left behind and just near extinction, when
in fact they are the OUTCOME of social evolution and proceed from us,
did not preceded us...

Danilo J Bonsignore
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: The fate of the Earth?
Next: Solution Manual Intermediate Accounting 13th edition Kieso Weygandt