From: Stan Hoeppner on
����������� ������ put forth on 6/10/2010 4:15 AM:

I'd attack the problem from another angle. You may be better served by adding
some more dnsbl checks rather that fighting spoofs:
http://www.mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=blacklist%3a111.67.207.126

As you can see the IP sample you gave is already listed by multiple dnsbls.

> smtpd_delay_reject = yes
>
> smtpd_client_restrictions =
> permit_mynetworks,
> permit_sasl_authenticated,
> reject_unknown_client_hostname,
> reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
> reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org

+ reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org [1]
reject_rbl_client spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
reject_rbl_client recent.spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
reject_rhsbl_client dbl.spamhaus.org

> smtpd_sender_restrictions =

+ reject_rhsbl_sender dbl.spamhaus.org

> smtpd_helo_restrictions =

+ reject_rhsbl_helo dbl.spamhaus.org


[1] The BRBL is free to use but requires a sign-up:
http://barracudacentral.org/account/register

--
Stan

From: =?koi8-r?Q?=F0=CF=CB=CF=D4=C9=CC=C5=CE=CB=CF_?= =?koi8-r?Q?=EB=CF=D3=D4=C9=CB?= on
� ���, 10/06/2010 � 08:01 -0500, Stan Hoeppner �����:
> ����������� ������ put forth on 6/10/2010 4:15 AM:
>
> I'd attack the problem from another angle. You may be better served by adding
> some more dnsbl checks rather that fighting spoofs:
> http://www.mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=blacklist%3a111.67.207.126
>
> As you can see the IP sample you gave is already listed by multiple dnsbls.
>
> > smtpd_delay_reject = yes
> >
> > smtpd_client_restrictions =
> > permit_mynetworks,
> > permit_sasl_authenticated,
> > reject_unknown_client_hostname,
> > reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
> > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
>
> + reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org [1]
> reject_rbl_client spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> reject_rbl_client recent.spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> reject_rhsbl_client dbl.spamhaus.org
>
> > smtpd_sender_restrictions =
>
> + reject_rhsbl_sender dbl.spamhaus.org
>
> > smtpd_helo_restrictions =
>
> + reject_rhsbl_helo dbl.spamhaus.org
>
>
> [1] The BRBL is free to use but requires a sign-up:
> http://barracudacentral.org/account/register

Thanks for suggestion, I'll apply it.

But if somebody can help discover (configuration) error which
prioritizing postmaster that would be nice.

--
����������� ������ <casper(a)meteor.dp.ua>

From: Stan Hoeppner on
����������� ������ put forth on 6/10/2010 8:04 AM:

> Thanks for suggestion, I'll apply it.

You're welcome.

> But if somebody can help discover (configuration) error which
> prioritizing postmaster that would be nice.

"postconf -d | grep mail_version" might be helpful. IIRC some early versions
of Postfix had some things related to postmaster hard coded.

--
Stan

From: =?koi8-r?Q?=F0=CF=CB=CF=D4=C9=CC=C5=CE=CB=CF_?= =?koi8-r?Q?=EB=CF=D3=D4=C9=CB?= on
� ���, 10/06/2010 � 08:32 -0500, Stan Hoeppner �����:
> ����������� ������ put forth on 6/10/2010 8:04 AM:
>
> > Thanks for suggestion, I'll apply it.
>
> You're welcome.
>
> > But if somebody can help discover (configuration) error which
> > prioritizing postmaster that would be nice.
>
> "postconf -d | grep mail_version" might be helpful. IIRC some early versions
> of Postfix had some things related to postmaster hard coded.

This is Debian lenny.

# postconf -d | grep mail_version
mail_version = 2.5.5
milter_macro_v = $mail_name $mail_version

--
����������� ������ <casper(a)meteor.dp.ua>

From: Wietse Venema on
If the postmaster address is excluded from spam checks then you
may want to change the address_verify_sender setting.

The current default is:
address_verify_sender = $double_bounce_sender

The older (problematic) default is
address_verify_sender = postmaster

The final ultimate fix is to make address_verify_sender time-dependent,
so that it does not become a spam sink itself.

Wietse