From: Bruno Wolff III on
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 08:37:48 +0000,
Phillip Lougher <phillip(a)lougher.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following patches add LZMA decompression support to Squashfs, using the
> in-kernel LZMA decompression library.

Do these still have a chance to make 2.6.33?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Phillip Lougher on
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 08:37:48 +0000,
> Phillip Lougher <phillip(a)lougher.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The following patches add LZMA decompression support to Squashfs, using the
>> in-kernel LZMA decompression library.
>
> Do these still have a chance to make 2.6.33?
>

It's very unlikely. Andrew wanted it to spend a cycle in linux-next. I'll then
try for 2.6.34 merge. I'm happy with that.

Phillip

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Bruno Wolff III on
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 23:47:30 +0000,
Phillip Lougher <phillip(a)lougher.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 08:37:48 +0000,
> > Phillip Lougher <phillip(a)lougher.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>The following patches add LZMA decompression support to Squashfs, using the
> >>in-kernel LZMA decompression library.
> >
> >Do these still have a chance to make 2.6.33?
> >
>
> It's very unlikely. Andrew wanted it to spend a cycle in linux-next. I'll then
> try for 2.6.34 merge. I'm happy with that.

I hadn't seen it show up there yet either. But maybe its a bit too early
for that. If it gets there I might have a chance of convincing one of
the Fedora kernel guys of back porting it, since F13 is likely to be released
with the 2,6,34 kernel in any case. (Along with some actual numbers for
our live iso images to show it's important to have. But I can get those
using the devel version of squashfs without the kernel changes.)
I'll keep an eye out for it showing up in linux-next. Thanks for the update.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Bruno Wolff III on
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 23:47:30 +0000,
Phillip Lougher <phillip(a)lougher.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> It's very unlikely. Andrew wanted it to spend a cycle in linux-next. I'll then
> try for 2.6.34 merge. I'm happy with that.
>
> Phillip

linux-next still hasn't picked these patches up. It would give me more leverage
in getting the patches into Fedora 13 if they were to be in linux-next.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Bruno Wolff III on
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 06:06:34 -0600,
Bruno Wolff III <bruno(a)wolff.to> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 23:47:30 +0000,
> Phillip Lougher <phillip(a)lougher.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > It's very unlikely. Andrew wanted it to spend a cycle in linux-next. I'll then
> > try for 2.6.34 merge. I'm happy with that.
> >
> > Phillip
>
> linux-next still hasn't picked these patches up. It would give me more leverage
> in getting the patches into Fedora 13 if they were to be in linux-next.

I see that they made it into the January 1st linux-next tree. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/