Prev: ISO C++ forbids initialization in array new
Next: extern versus #include
From: Frank Birbacher on 20 Dec 2009 11:02
Hi!

ManicQin schrieb:
> while using boost::operators I bump into a stack overflow.

To me it was too complicated to understand. Since someone already found
the solution, you should be fine. Just a word about searching (although
this is not about C++ specifically, it might help people with stack
overflows):

> p.s. since http://stackoverflow.com is online you
> cant really Google anything that has the phrase
> "stack overflow" ...

You can use the "phrase"
-site:stackoverflow.com
with your search request to skip all results from that site.

Frank

--
[ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]
[ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]

From: ManicQin on 20 Dec 2009 22:04
On Dec 21, 6:02 am, Frank Birbacher <bloodymir.c...(a)gmx.net> wrote:
>
> To me it was too complicated to understand. Since someone already found
> the solution, you should be fine. Just a word about searching (although
> this is not about C++ specifically, it might help people with stack
> overflows):
>
> > p.s. sincehttp://stackoverflow.comis online you
> > cant really Google anything that has the phrase
> > "stack overflow" ...
>
> You can use the "phrase"
> -site:stackoverflow.com
> with your search request to skip all results from that site.
>
> Frank

Hi, thanks Yechezkel.

I agree that "freeing" the operators is better but
I have specializations according to is_integral and is_class<string>
so it seemed better to "hold" the implementation according to the
specialization and not as friends.

Thanks Frank, I did try -stackoverflow.com without the "site"
and it didn't work but good to know the correct form.


--
[ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]
[ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: ISO C++ forbids initialization in array new
Next: extern versus #include