From: Thomas Gleixner on 16 Apr 2010 16:00 Steven, On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 21:01 -0700, Chase Douglas wrote: > > > > 2) tracing off can be done via filters on functions and/or events > > > already - so I doubt that the tracing_off_event(level) is necessary > > > at all. > > > > > > schedule_bug() definitely deserves a separate trace_schedule_bug() > > > event which can be used to stop the tracer by already existing > > > functionality. > > > > Steven said he would be fine with a separate TRACE_EVENT_<blah> macro > > for the schedule bug if needed, but I'm not sure we need to go that > > far. If it's configurable through debugfs at run time then it serves > > my purpose. Unless you feel we should have finer grained control > > specifically for scheduling while atomic bugs, I'll just leave it as > > TRACE_EVENT_WARN. > > I actually like Thomas's idea better. I need to add the "stop trace on > event" functionality, and we can insert trace events for bugs, and not I just assumed that it would work for events already. The stop trace on function filter works perfect and is a very conveniant tool. > have this whole "stop tracing here" functions. Instead we could just add > tracepoints and have a way to pick and choose where to stop tracing. > > add a: > > include/trace/events/errors.h > > #define TRACE_SYSTEM errors > > TRACE_EVENT(sched_bug, ....) > > etc, > > > When I get back home, I'll add this functionality to stop tracing on > events. Perhaps I'll even add "TRACE_SUB_SYSTEM" so in the events > directory, we can have sub layers: > > events/errors/BUG/... > events/errors/WARNING/... I like that idea. That's solving the problem in a very elegant way. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Chase Douglas on 19 Apr 2010 18:40 > 2) tracing off can be done via filters on functions and/or events > � already - so I doubt that the tracing_off_event(level) is necessary > � at all. I just found what you were meaning here, since there's no documentation yet about the traceon/traceoff filter command. This would do exactly what we want for helping us fix bugs. I'll write some info about the command in ftrace.txt and send a patch for review so no one else is left out of the party :). -- Chase -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: reiserfs locking Next: [PATCH] Staging: dream: smd: smd_qmi: fix code style issues |