Strange result from straightening
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: A3 Photo Printer choice.
Next: Jupiter
From: Ray Fischer on 21 Oct 2009 22:48 More Info <minfo(a)myaddress.com> wrote: >On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:24:27 -0700, Savageduck ><savageduck@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: > >>On 2009-10-21 18:59:07 -0700, More Info <minfo(a)myaddress.com> said: >> >>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:43:30 -0500, Peabody <waybackNO784SPAM44(a)yahoo.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Please note that I said I used a Canon A590 to take the >>>> pictures. So, not to shock you, but Photoshop isn't in my >>>> budget. Well how about Irfanview? Will it straighten and >>>> resample/resize properly? Or maybe XnView or Faststone? >>>> >>> >>> Don't think less of that camera because of cost. In the hands of a talented >>> photographer any camera can produce excellent results. The Canon Powershots >>> are not to be taken lightly just because of cost. I've won several >>> international awards with the ones I've used. >> >>...and which International awards would those be. >>Name, date and citation might be interesting to see. >> >>The Nobel Fantasy Prize perhaps? > >Do you honestly think I'd let a useless troll like you enjoy my good Run along, troll. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: Mike Russell on 22 Oct 2009 00:14 On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:40:33 -0500, More Info wrote: > Do you honestly think I'd let a useless troll like you enjoy my good > photography? Or that I can somehow be manipulated by a loser like you into > doing so? You're more stupid than I thought. Wow. > > Your lack of intellect duly noted. But then, we all already knew that now, > didn't we. Even you. Please forgive us if the fact that you *say* you won these awards, yet choose to keep your identity secret, does undercut your credibility. -- Mike Russell - http://www.curvemeister.com
From: John McWilliams on 22 Oct 2009 00:18 Mike Russell wrote: > On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:40:33 -0500, More Info wrote: > >> Do you honestly think I'd let a useless troll like you enjoy my good >> photography? Or that I can somehow be manipulated by a loser like you into >> doing so? You're more stupid than I thought. Wow. >> >> Your lack of intellect duly noted. But then, we all already knew that now, >> didn't we. Even you. > > Please forgive us if the fact that you *say* you won these awards, yet > choose to keep your identity secret, does undercut your credibility. Correction: There's no credibility to undermine. None, Zero, Nada, Zilch, ad naseum. -- john mcwilliams
From: Mike Russell on 22 Oct 2009 00:27 On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:18:58 -0700, John McWilliams wrote: > Mike Russell wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:40:33 -0500, More Info wrote: >> >>> Do you honestly think I'd let a useless troll like you enjoy my good >>> photography? Or that I can somehow be manipulated by a loser like you into >>> doing so? You're more stupid than I thought. Wow. >>> >>> Your lack of intellect duly noted. But then, we all already knew that now, >>> didn't we. Even you. >> >> Please forgive us if the fact that you *say* you won these awards, yet >> choose to keep your identity secret, does undercut your credibility. > > > Correction: There's no credibility to undermine. None, Zero, Nada, > Zilch, ad naseum. LOL. Spot on. -- Mike Russell - http://www.curvemeister.com
From: Mike Russell on 22 Oct 2009 01:11
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:58:22 -0500, More Info wrote: > Do you honestly think that I care one iota on whether or not you perceive a > person credible? You have already demonstrated, by the mere fact of remaining anonymous, that your credibility does not matter to you. If you are laboring under the illusion that your words speak for themselves, let me disabuse you of that fantasy. -- Mike Russell - http://www.curvemeister.com |