Prev: An Understanding of Gravity
Next: The Harmonizer: April 2010
From: Y.Porat on 25 Apr 2010 04:01
On Apr 25, 12:07 am, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu>
wrote:
> When you plot a histogram of particle masses from 100 MeV to 1800 MeV,
> and then adjust the peak heights to reflect the particle "widths",
> i.e., stability, you get a very unqiue spectrum that the "standard
> model" is completely unable to explain.
>
> Using the (sqrt n)(revised Planck mass) relation derived from GR and
> QM in my recent paper, I can reproduce a unique and statistically
> significant 1st approximation fit to the unique and enigmatic particle
> mass spectrum.  You cannot call this numerology.  It is the physics of
> the new paradigm, which will make the "standard model" look
> exceedingly Ptolemaic. Paper can be read for free at:http://journalofcosmology.com/OldershawRobert.pdf, orhttp://arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0701/0701006.pdf.
>
> I would have thought that any physicist would be highly interested in
> what I am doing.
>
> Imagine my surprise!
>
> Best,
> RLOwww.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw

----------------------
you have a 'little ' problem:

the Alpha patticle
ios not a sphere with 'radius''
and thereis noting there that is ritating around some
one center !!
it could be that trhe center og gravity of that structure
is a center of rotation but then
youdint hae sort of a solid shere
but a lot of vacum in it as well
between the
protons and neutrons if you take them as
chains of orbitals directed to 4 directins in space
(a tetrahedron !!!)


see my abstract"

http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract

EVEN IS YOU WRITE IT IN 'SCI.PHYSICS.RESEARCH IT IS WRONG

and you can learn something from someone in the
'Plebeian' of simple sci.physics (:-)
so please tel it to your parrots on the sci.research as well

ATB
Y.Porat
---------------------



ATB
Y.Porat
--------------------------
From: Robert L. Oldershaw on 25 Apr 2010 14:55
On Apr 25, 4:01 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> EVEN IS YOU WRITE IT IN 'SCI.PHYSICS.RESEARCH   IT IS WRONG
>


Goodness, the signal to noise ratio in this newsgroup is a tad low.
From: BURT on 25 Apr 2010 16:32
On Apr 25, 11:55 am, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu>
wrote:
> On Apr 25, 4:01 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > EVEN IS YOU WRITE IT IN 'SCI.PHYSICS.RESEARCH   IT IS WRONG
>
> Goodness, the signal to noise ratio in this newsgroup is a tad low.

God created first space, time and mass. He is now creating gravity.
From: Robert L. Oldershaw on 25 Apr 2010 21:32
On Apr 25, 4:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

> God created first space, time and mass. He is now creating gravity.

Or is it levity?

From: BURT on 25 Apr 2010 21:42
On Apr 25, 6:32 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu>
wrote:
> On Apr 25, 4:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > God created first space, time and mass. He is now creating gravity.
>
> Or is it levity?

No. But he is into levatation.

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: An Understanding of Gravity
Next: The Harmonizer: April 2010