From: John Larkin on 4 Feb 2010 11:15 On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:38:46 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill <BretCahill(a)peoplepc.com> wrote: >> > Obviously the same noise causing one signal to increase is causing the >> > other to decrease. > >> False inference, there. �The 'sum of two signals' has twice the signal > >Depends on the 2 signals. That's generally not true. > >> but the noise is uncorrelated, > >In this case the sum of the two signals has the exact same shape and >phase angle as each noise free signal. > >There's a very small chance this may suggest some algebraic solution >where the noise can be somehow subtracted and lock in filtering can be >avoided altogether. > >> so the sum of the two noises is >> expected to be sqrt(2) times the individual noise values. > >The quotient of the two signals is the goal so any magnitude change >from filtering will cancel out. > >> You are getting better signal/noise ratio in the sum than in either >> of the two input terms, that's to be expected. > >It isn't merely better. The noise cancels out _altogether_ in the >sum. > >The sum, however, isn't what is desired. > >The sum is only useful as a reference to clean up the two signals. > >It would be surprising in no one went down this path before on a >similar situation. > > >Bret Cahill > > > I have no idea what you're talking about, and I suspect you don't either. John
From: John Larkin on 4 Feb 2010 16:36 On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:45:07 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill <BretCahill(a)peoplepc.com> wrote: >S1 = signal 1 > >S2 = signal 2 > >S1/S2 = desired output which would be a const. dc without noise. > >N = noise > >(S1 + N)/(S2 - N) = actual output. > >Noise is amplified in output. > >c = const. > >S1 + c(S2) is proportional to and has same phase angle as noise free >S1 as well as noise free S2 but is completely impervious to noise and >therefore can be used as a reference for lock in amp. If S1 + c(S2) is as you say, then the final value of S1/S2 = K, where K is any constant you like. So the output of your signal processing box is a DC voltage, and you save a lot of money by eliminating input connectors. John
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Snubber for triac light switch? Next: R. T. Cahill's Quantum Foam Theory |