Summary of C++0x Feature Availability
in [C++]
|
Prev: Is "<unsigned type here> var = -1;" specified behavior?
Next: I keep running into long term c++ programmers who refuse to use exceptions
From: Scott Meyers on 6 Mar 2010 08:15 I've put together a summary of C++0x support in gcc and MSVC, and I think this summary may be useful to others. It's now available at http://www.aristeia.com/C++0x/C++0xFeatureAvailability.htm . Both C++0x and compiler support for it are moving targets, so the information in the summary will get out of date over time, and of course there may be errors in the summary as it stands now. My goal is to keep the summary both accurate and up to date, so if you see anything that needs improvement, please let me know: smeyers(a)aristeia.com. Thanks, Scott -- [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ] [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]
From: Brian on 6 Mar 2010 15:29 On Mar 6, 7:15 pm, Scott Meyers <NeverR...(a)aristeia.com> wrote: > I've put together a summary of C++0x support in gcc and MSVC, and I think this > summary may be useful to others. It's now available athttp://www.aristeia.com/C++0x/C++0xFeatureAvailability.htm. > > Both C++0x and compiler support for it are moving targets, so the information in > the summary will get out of date over time, and of course there may be errors in > the summary as it stands now. My goal is to keep the summary both accurate and > up to date, so if you see anything that needs improvement, please let me know: > smey...(a)aristeia.com. > To summarize the summary, it looks like gnu, intel and microsoft are leading the pack. Whereas HP, IBM and Sun are falling behind. Brian Wood http://webEbenezer.net (651) 251-9384 -- [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ] [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]
From: Scott Meyers on 7 Mar 2010 05:00 Brian wrote: > To summarize the summary, it looks like gnu, intel and microsoft > are leading the pack. Whereas HP, IBM and Sun are falling > behind. Something else worth taking away from the summary is that there is a *lot* of C++0x available to play with right now. auto, lambdas, rvalue references, variadic templates, uniform initialization, nullptr, decltype, static_assert, default and deleted functions, unique_ptr, forward_list, regular expressions, and a whole bunch more are at your disposal. Alas, no compiler (that I know of) offers all these things at the same time, but for purposes of playing around with different features (and many combinations of features), C++0x is your oyster. Scott -- [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ] [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]
From: Mathias Gaunard on 7 Mar 2010 16:05 On 7 mar, 01:15, Scott Meyers <NeverR...(a)aristeia.com> wrote: > I've put together a summary of C++0x support in gcc and MSVC, and I think this > summary may be useful to others. It's now available athttp://www.aristeia.com/C++0x/C++0xFeatureAvailability.htm. You give the current support of a MSVC beta, but not that of the 4.5 branch of GCC? -- [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ] [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]
From: Scott Meyers on 8 Mar 2010 02:17
Mathias Gaunard wrote: > You give the current support of a MSVC beta, but not that of the 4.5 > branch of GCC? Right, sorry. I give information for what I personally checked. If it makes you feel any better, I don't give information for MSVC 10 RC, which came out recently. I haven't had time to do any testing with that compiler, either. Scott -- [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ] [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ] |