Prev: The Aether
Next: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 6, johnreed
From: granite stone on 15 Nov 2009 21:56 I read an article that the moon's force on the mantle might give us magma and magma is not chemical. In the same way some of the larger planets may have a pull on our sun's mantle giving us solar radiation. Since the sun spins every 6 days the spin travels through the pull on the sun's mantle, energy, huge amounts of it, is given off. If all stars are suns, you could say each star has planet pulling on each sun's mantle. Jon Riley Toronto
From: BURT on 15 Nov 2009 22:11 On Nov 15, 6:56 pm, granite stone <jrblackwa...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I read an article that the moon's force on the mantle might give us > magma and magma is not chemical. In the same way some of the larger > planets may have a pull on our sun's mantle giving us solar > radiation. Since the sun spins every 6 days the spin travels through > the pull on the sun's mantle, energy, huge amounts of it, is given > off. If all stars are suns, you could say each star has planet > pulling on each sun's mantle. > > Jon Riley > Toronto The aether of the sun is more important. Mitch Raemsch
From: granite stone on 15 Nov 2009 22:34 On Nov 15, 10:11 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Nov 15, 6:56 pm, granite stone <jrblackwa...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > I read an article that the moon's force on the mantle might give us > > magma and magma is not chemical. In the same way some of the larger > > planets may have a pull on our sun's mantle giving us solar > > radiation. Since the sun spins every 6 days the spin travels through > > the pull on the sun's mantle, energy, huge amounts of it, is given > > off. If all stars are suns, you could say each star has planet > > pulling on each sun's mantle. > > > Jon Riley > > Toronto > > The aether of the sun is more important. > > Mitch Raemsch If you google tidal forces Io, lots come up from NASA.
From: BURT on 15 Nov 2009 23:29 On Nov 15, 7:34 pm, granite stone <jrblackwa...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 15, 10:11 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Nov 15, 6:56 pm, granite stone <jrblackwa...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I read an article that the moon's force on the mantle might give us > > > magma and magma is not chemical. In the same way some of the larger > > > planets may have a pull on our sun's mantle giving us solar > > > radiation. Since the sun spins every 6 days the spin travels through > > > the pull on the sun's mantle, energy, huge amounts of it, is given > > > off. If all stars are suns, you could say each star has planet > > > pulling on each sun's mantle. > > > > Jon Riley > > > Toronto > > > The aether of the sun is more important. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > If you google tidal forces Io, lots come up from NASA.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Tidal forces mean that gravity can pass through itself demonstrated by the moon and earth. Mitch Raemsch
From: Androcles on 16 Nov 2009 01:01 "granite stone" <jrblackwatch(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:28b9aa27-a3bb-47a8-9c05-f9bc1d3ade44(a)d5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >I read an article that the moon's force on the mantle might give us > magma and magma is not chemical. In the same way some of the larger > planets may have a pull on our sun's mantle giving us solar > radiation. Since the sun spins every 6 days the spin travels through > the pull on the sun's mantle, energy, huge amounts of it, is given > off. If all stars are suns, you could say each star has planet > pulling on each sun's mantle. > > Jon Riley > Toronto The theory you are talking about applies to the Earth's crust, which is being flexed by the Moon's pull just as the oceans are and produce tides. That flexing produces heat, just as a car's tyres heat up when flexed. Saying the sun has a mantle is like saying an orange has albumen. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egg_white
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: The Aether Next: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 6, johnreed |