Prev: Poles in a Sea of R-G-B
Next: Winter is near
From: Robert Coe on 21 Jun 2010 22:31 On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:56:26 -0700, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: : On 2010-06-20 15:00:50 -0700, "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> said: : : > http://www.blind-apertures.ca/LatestPics/SundayAfternoon.jpg (full size) : > http://www.blind-apertures.ca/LatestPics/SundayAfternoonSmall.jpg (fast : > loading) : > : > It's kind of a lazy day, here, so I snapped this shot of my daughter : > relaxing with Mich. : > : > I doubt there's much wrong, technically, with it, but I'm sure some fault : > can be found if one looks critically enough... : > : > Take Care, : > Dudley : : To hell with the critics. This is a great shot for Father's Day Dudley. : I have to say this is is probably one of the best you have managed to : capture and present to us. What critics? Aside from minor cropping suggestions reflecting individual taste, what would one criticize? Bob
From: Dudley Hanks on 21 Jun 2010 22:41 "Robert Coe" <bob(a)1776.COM> wrote in message news:vv7026htaj5q0lerp7a6aoh25h0rjrkrfn(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:56:26 -0700, Savageduck > <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: > : On 2010-06-20 15:00:50 -0700, "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> > said: > : > : > http://www.blind-apertures.ca/LatestPics/SundayAfternoon.jpg (full > size) > : > http://www.blind-apertures.ca/LatestPics/SundayAfternoonSmall.jpg > (fast > : > loading) > : > > : > It's kind of a lazy day, here, so I snapped this shot of my daughter > : > relaxing with Mich. > : > > : > I doubt there's much wrong, technically, with it, but I'm sure some > fault > : > can be found if one looks critically enough... > : > > : > Take Care, > : > Dudley > : > : To hell with the critics. This is a great shot for Father's Day Dudley. > : I have to say this is is probably one of the best you have managed to > : capture and present to us. > > What critics? Aside from minor cropping suggestions reflecting individual > taste, what would one criticize? > > Bob Thanks, Bob, I appreciate the thought. It was a great Fathers Day, and I'm glad the pic captured the feeling. Take Care, Dudley
From: Henry Olson on 21 Jun 2010 22:58 On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 22:31:52 -0400, Robert Coe <bob(a)1776.COM> wrote: >On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:56:26 -0700, Savageduck ><savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >: On 2010-06-20 15:00:50 -0700, "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> said: >: >: > http://www.blind-apertures.ca/LatestPics/SundayAfternoon.jpg (full size) >: > http://www.blind-apertures.ca/LatestPics/SundayAfternoonSmall.jpg (fast >: > loading) >: > >: > It's kind of a lazy day, here, so I snapped this shot of my daughter >: > relaxing with Mich. >: > >: > I doubt there's much wrong, technically, with it, but I'm sure some fault >: > can be found if one looks critically enough... >: > >: > Take Care, >: > Dudley >: >: To hell with the critics. This is a great shot for Father's Day Dudley. >: I have to say this is is probably one of the best you have managed to >: capture and present to us. > >What critics? Aside from minor cropping suggestions reflecting individual >taste, what would one criticize? > >Bob Oh, I don't know. The words and phrases of "banal", "mundane", "2-year-old's snapshot", "the fully automated camera did all the work", etc., come to mind.
From: Dudley Hanks on 21 Jun 2010 23:08 "Henry Olson" <henryolson(a)nospam.org> wrote in message news:rh90261sbn0pdvo3rd0hasmb9egjknn98h(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 22:31:52 -0400, Robert Coe <bob(a)1776.COM> wrote: > >>On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:56:26 -0700, Savageduck >><savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >>: On 2010-06-20 15:00:50 -0700, "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> >>said: >>: >>: > http://www.blind-apertures.ca/LatestPics/SundayAfternoon.jpg (full >>size) >>: > http://www.blind-apertures.ca/LatestPics/SundayAfternoonSmall.jpg >>(fast >>: > loading) >>: > >>: > It's kind of a lazy day, here, so I snapped this shot of my daughter >>: > relaxing with Mich. >>: > >>: > I doubt there's much wrong, technically, with it, but I'm sure some >>fault >>: > can be found if one looks critically enough... >>: > >>: > Take Care, >>: > Dudley >>: >>: To hell with the critics. This is a great shot for Father's Day Dudley. >>: I have to say this is is probably one of the best you have managed to >>: capture and present to us. >> >>What critics? Aside from minor cropping suggestions reflecting individual >>taste, what would one criticize? >> >>Bob > > Oh, I don't know. The words and phrases of "banal", "mundane", > "2-year-old's snapshot", "the fully automated camera did all the work", > etc., come to mind. > What's the matter, LOL, starting in with another ID? Here we go again... :) Take Care, Dudley
From: Robert Coe on 21 Jun 2010 23:28
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:58:10 -0500, Henry Olson <henryolson(a)nospam.org> wrote: : On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 22:31:52 -0400, Robert Coe <bob(a)1776.COM> wrote: : : >On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:56:26 -0700, Savageduck : ><savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: : >: On 2010-06-20 15:00:50 -0700, "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> said: : >: : >: > http://www.blind-apertures.ca/LatestPics/SundayAfternoon.jpg (full size) : >: > http://www.blind-apertures.ca/LatestPics/SundayAfternoonSmall.jpg (fast : >: > loading) : >: > : >: > It's kind of a lazy day, here, so I snapped this shot of my daughter : >: > relaxing with Mich. : >: > : >: > I doubt there's much wrong, technically, with it, but I'm sure some fault : >: > can be found if one looks critically enough... : >: > : >: > Take Care, : >: > Dudley : >: : >: To hell with the critics. This is a great shot for Father's Day Dudley. : >: I have to say this is is probably one of the best you have managed to : >: capture and present to us. : > : >What critics? Aside from minor cropping suggestions reflecting individual : >taste, what would one criticize? : > : >Bob : : Oh, I don't know. The words and phrases of "banal", "mundane", : "2-year-old's snapshot", "the fully automated camera did all the work", : etc., come to mind. Those come to your "mind"? Surely you jest. Bob |