Prev: ANN: I PRE-ORDERED KEVINPANZKE.CO AND KEVINJOHNPANZKE.CO RECENTLY!
Next: Windows7 64bits Credential Manager not working
From: sanjacstudent12 on 23 Apr 2010 01:49 There is too much content that has to be different between the two, as evidenced by the compatibility issues mentioned earlier. That being said, I have been using 64-bit systems since XP 64 first came out, and I should say that it is MUCH more difficult to find hardware and software that is incompatible with 64-bit. "Bill C" wrote: > On Apr 22, 1:15 pm, "Jerry" <ChiefZekeNoS...(a)MSN.com> wrote: > > Is the notebook even 64-bit capable? > > > Yes. I had my choice of 32-bit or 64-bit Vista. I chose 32-bit (I had > heard of some compatability issues with 64-bit windows). > > I wish Microsoft would make it easier to have systems with both 32-bit > and 64-bit Windows installed. A single installation of Windows should > do both and installed applications should be available to both as > well. > > As it is now, if I want both, I need to install my applications twice, > once for each version of Windows. > . >
From: John Barnes on 24 Apr 2010 11:36
You aren't licensed to have both versions installed at the same time, anyway. "Bill C" <mousepoop.com(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:57c3de40-3bfc-4b21-b9d0-81428288b716(a)g30g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 22, 1:15 pm, "Jerry" <ChiefZekeNoS...(a)MSN.com> wrote: >> Is the notebook even 64-bit capable? >> > Yes. I had my choice of 32-bit or 64-bit Vista. I chose 32-bit (I had > heard of some compatability issues with 64-bit windows). > > I wish Microsoft would make it easier to have systems with both 32-bit > and 64-bit Windows installed. A single installation of Windows should > do both and installed applications should be available to both as > well. > > As it is now, if I want both, I need to install my applications twice, > once for each version of Windows. |