From: oparr on
> Then you need one with clean current limiting or hang a large capacitor
> onto it. But there is often a maximum allowed capacitance so I'd ask the
> manufacturer.

Thanks! I'll get one of the CC limiting types and see how that fares.


On Dec 5, 10:53 am, Joerg <inva...(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
From: Joerg on
Jamie wrote:
> Joerg wrote:
>
>> oparr(a)hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>>> Depends on your application. If those spikes are "normal" in your
>>>> scenario and not an indicator of doomsday being around the corner then
>>>> constant current may be your ticket.
>>>
>>>
>>> App is low power DC servo CNC. Unregulated DC supplies are the norm
>>> here but nowadays a SPS can be cheaper than the AC transformer alone.
>>> DC motor current spikes are the norm and harmless to the motors.
>>> Problem is the spikes trip SPS shutdown types and cause the servo
>>> drive to trip on excess following error, due to lost voltage during
>>> hiccups, with SPS hiccup types.
>>>
>>
>> Then you need one with clean current limiting or hang a large
>> capacitor onto it. But there is often a maximum allowed capacitance so
>> I'd ask the manufacturer.
>>
> He just needs a choke and load R ..
>
> common problem.
>

But make sure to push the choke back in after 1-2 miles :-)

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
From: Robert Latest on
["Followup-To:" header set to sci.electronics.design.]
oparr(a)hotmail.com wrote:
>> Depends on your application. If those spikes are "normal" in your
>> scenario and not an indicator of doomsday being around the corner then
>> constant current may be your ticket.
>
> App is low power DC servo CNC. Unregulated DC supplies are the norm
> here but nowadays a SPS can be cheaper than the AC transformer alone.
> DC motor current spikes are the norm and harmless to the motors.
> Problem is the spikes trip SPS shutdown types and cause the servo
> drive to trip on excess following error, due to lost voltage during
> hiccups, with SPS hiccup types.

Been there, done that. Since I built only one unit, I finally opted for
the unregulated standard supply in favor of trying to finding a suitable
SMPS. My app involved moving heavy gear with infrequent hard
accelerations but generally slow motion and low forces. So I dimensioned
pretty wimpy and went into up to 5x overload during acceleration
(Shouldn't have used toroids though).

In a given application you might get away with a SMPS rated for --say--
50% of max power or with a unregulated DC rated at 20%, which might
make the UDC favourable again. But it really depends on the app.

robert
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: SMD identification: please help!
Next: core memory