THE FACTOR OF 6 ERROR IN CURRENT MATHEMATICS, AS SHOWN BY CLEAR MATHEMATICS ("F" stay out)
in [Math]
|
Prev: THE FACTOR OF 6 ERROR IN CURRENT MATHEMATICS, AS SHOWN BY CLEAR MATHEMATICS ("F" stay out)
Next: trace of Thermite (tm) at WTC, almost no asbestos: if the main beams had been clad, they mightn't have weakened enough to collapse!
From: Inverse 19 mathematics on 30 Jul 2010 14:36 On Jul 30, 1:30 pm, Inverse 19 mathematics <hope9...(a)verizon.net> wrote: > Here it is for the record > > These numbers that run on the edge of Divergence are not divisible by > 2, 3 , include all prime numbers in cionvergent / devergent series > +1-1 > > -1,5,11, 17, 23, 29 (N/6=n 5/6 without exception till infinity) > > +1 ,7,13,19,(25),31 (N/6=n1/6 without exception till infinity) > > Thus the tangent between 1 and -1 = 1-5/6 = 1/6 ---*.001(1-.999) = > 0.00016666667 > > NOTE YOU STUPID FERMATISTS!! > > "All prime numbers without exception when divided by 6 leave a > residue of 1/6 for divergence and 5/6 for convergence, as a result of > tangent -1-- "That tangent is the basis of all Mathematics" That > tangent -1 has solved the prime number placement and primality at Hope > research. > > WITNESS COPY to Professor Eddie Escultura PHD > > If you cannot understand the above mathematics,( that if factor 6 > seperatesthe vertical and the horizontal in a divergence there has to > be a -1 gap in the base inverse), if you do not understand the > Mathematics stick to Flt or Riemann who missed -1. Better yet keep > discussing Einstein for the next century, you have gotten no place, > because of his bad mathematics. > > Hope Research AS We said we need to be respectful, but there comes a time when one has to call a spade as spade. Your current mathematics has some major flaws and that is the reason we have solved Prime Placement into billions , and primality equation etc etc . We have posted what we needed to post, and we will not waste our time . The challenge to current marthematics re Prime Sieve stands, and will take place in Wis USA, when ever Hope Research
From: YBM on 30 Jul 2010 16:16 Inverse 19 mathematics wrote: > [garbage] > AS We said we need to be respectful, but there comes a time when one > has to call a spade as spade. You've solved nothing, and it is time to call a kook a kook: all of "Hope Research" is a bunch of kooks and nothing else. I've translated your spaghetti monster BASIC source code in Perl, I even optimized it a little bit while doing so. This is far the WORSE program I've ever seen, and I've seen a lot of bad programs during the last twenty years or so. Then I compared how it performs against Eratosthenes sieve, written in Perl too. (source codes at : http://www.everythinguseless.org/inverse19demented/ ) To get all prime numbers lesser than 100000 Eratosthenes sieves takes 300 milliseconds on a Core 2 Duo 1Ghz computer. Moreover it gives you all prime number sorted. Your program took about 15 minutes ! Moreover prime numbers are given unsorted and your program stopped *before* 99991 and gave 85201 as the last number before stopping. Nothing surprising, what is surprising as a matter of fact, is that your program actually gives all prime numbers up to 85201. You are bad mathematicians, bad programmers, bad english writers, you have bad manners, but you are not completely wrong: you've succeeded in doing something right in a completely useless and inefficient way. Do you realize that : you're program is 50 times worse than a algorithm discovered more than 2200 years ago? And *you* pretend to reform modern math? How ridiculous...
From: YBM on 30 Jul 2010 16:27
Inverse 19 mathematics a �crit : > The challenge to > current marthematics re Prime Sieve stands, and will take place in Wis > USA, when ever Any one with a computer and a version of Perl (which is free software) can can check that you've missed your own challenge by a ratio of 1 against 50 comparing to Eratosthenes sieve : http://www.everythinguseless.org/inverse19demented/ No need to be in Wisconsin to do that. |