THE HOLY GRAIL ~ CANTOR DISPROOF
in [Math]
|
Prev: Simple permutation question
Next: INFINITE LIST OF PRIME NUMBERS BY PLACEMENT BY NEW -1TANGENT MATHEMATICS
From: Aatu Koskensilta on 29 May 2010 08:56 Transfer Principle <lwalke3(a)lausd.net> writes: > I'd much rather be overly accommodating to Herc than be the poster who > is responsible for scaring Herc away. The idea that anyone could scare Herc away is absurd. > And it was all because Aatu criticized me for defending Herc, > and I had to react to his criticism. When did I criticize you for defending Herc? You're imagining things. -- Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta(a)uta.fi) "Wovon man nicht sprechan kann, dar�ber muss man schweigen" - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
From: |-|ercules on 29 May 2010 09:23 "Aatu Koskensilta" <aatu.koskensilta(a)uta.fi> wrote ... > "|-|ercules" <radgray123(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >> You said it was a statement of incontrovertible fact, you just snipped >> that! > > I didn't claim to have any mathematical proof of the fact. Indeed, since > it is not a mathematical claim there can be no question of a > mathematical proof. Just read the subsequent explanation in the thread > you quote from. So you claim incontrovertible facts exist without proof? Or incontrovertible facts exist with non mathematical proofs? Herc
From: Marshall on 29 May 2010 10:23 On May 28, 8:45 pm, Transfer Principle <lwal...(a)lausd.net> wrote: > On May 28, 8:10 pm, Marshall <marshall.spi...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > So what happens? I decide to consider the possibility that > > > Herc might be wrong. And then Herc becomes offended > > > and decides to stop posting. > > > > SFW? He'll be back tomorrow. > > We'll see about that. Ahem. > > > What I want to be able to do is speak to posters like Herc in > > > such a way as not to be a "bully" to them, yet avoid drawing > > > criticism from others, like Aatu in this thread. > > I and others criticize you for wanting that. It's unachievable, > > and if it was achievable, it'd be undesirable. > > Then what should I do the next time someone makes a claim > that is refuted by ZFC? I suppose that I should continue to > do what I did in this thread, and consider all the main reasons > that someone might make such a claim. No, silly boy. You should say what you think the truth is, and why. Note that my proposal doesn't have you bending over to try to include everyone in the Great Love Blanket of Diversity. Look, if you'd just come out and admit that you're 14, or whatever your deal is, and listen to your elders, then everyone would be saying what an amazingly smart 14 year old you are. Instead, by trying to take the place of a grownup, which you decidedly do not have the life experience for, you come off looking like a guy with a big heart, some interest in math, and terrible taste in people. Sci.math does not require that you bring enough gum for everyone. Marshall
From: David R Tribble on 29 May 2010 11:39 Transfer Principle (L Walker) wrote: >> Then what should I do the next time someone makes a claim >> that is refuted by ZFC? I suppose that I should continue to >> do what I did in this thread, and consider all the main reasons >> that someone might make such a claim. > Marshall wrote: > No, silly boy. You should say what you think the truth is, > and why. Note that my proposal doesn't have you > bending over to try to include everyone in the Great > Love Blanket of Diversity. > > Look, if you'd just come out and admit that you're > 14, or whatever your deal is, and listen to your > elders, then everyone would be saying what an > amazingly smart 14 year old you are. Instead, > by trying to take the place of a grownup, which > you decidedly do not have the life experience > for, you come off looking like a guy with a big > heart, some interest in math, and terrible taste > in people. Do you think that Walker likes (or possibly craves) all the attention given to his attempts to include the loons?
From: William Hughes on 29 May 2010 14:22
On May 29, 12:34 am, Transfer Principle <lwal...(a)lausd.net> wrote: > On May 27, 7:32 am, William Hughes <wpihug...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On May 27, 1:10 am, Transfer Principle <lwal...(a)lausd.net> wrote: > > > Probability? Random? > > It is true that You deleted a line without indication. - William Hughes |