Prev: non-recursive countable ordinal
Next: CANTOR'S PROOF: An AD(n) =/= L(n,n) -> An AD(n) =/= L(n,n)
From: bill on 17 Jun 2010 19:20
On Jun 16, 8:47 am, Inverse 19 mathematics <hope9...(a)verizon.net>
wrote:
>  We have proved it, but the arrogance of current mathematics  prevents
> it from understanding. This number is key to the placement of primes,

I am not convinced that the primes need to be "placed"!

> it is key to the circle at 360,

6 is no more key to the circle than 15 or 30 or 45
or 90.

> and the very inverse root of
> mathematics is at 1/10 of 1/6.

IMMHO, you are not completely sure this is absolutely
true.
>
>  Plus all prime numbers are divided by 6 with very  specific residue,

All prime numbers are divided by 2 with very
specific residue.

All prime numbers are divided by 4 with very
specific residue.

All prime numbers are divided by 8 with very
specific residue.

So what?

> 18X20 is the primordial proportion=360, ----etc

IMMHO, 4X90 is the primordial proportion. The first
thing that mathematicians noticed about the circle
is that it consisted of 4 quadrants of 90 degrees.

>
> 6*6*10=360
>
> 1/6*1/10 is possibly the -1 tanget.
>
> P.S Mathematicians(Any more Fermat/ Forest Gump jokes,  anybody?!!!),
> here are two more
>
>  Fermat --- What is 1^2?
>
>  Forest Gump-- It is a perfectly square box with exactly one choclate
> bar!!
>
> Fermat-- What is FLT?
>
> Forest Gump- It stands for " forward left turn" when you are running!!!

From: porky_pig_jr on 17 Jun 2010 19:48
On Jun 17, 7:20 pm, bill <b92...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> IMMHO, 4X90 is the primordial proportion. The first
>   thing that mathematicians noticed about the circle
>   is that it consisted of 4 quadrants of 90 degrees.
>

No, the first thing that mathematicians noticed about the circle is
that it's round.
From: Inverse 19 mathematics on 18 Jun 2010 11:02
On Jun 17, 6:48 pm, "porky_pig...(a)my-deja.com" <porky_pig...(a)my-
deja.com> wrote:
> On Jun 17, 7:20 pm, bill <b92...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > IMMHO, 4X90 is the primordial proportion. The first
> >   thing that mathematicians noticed about the circle
> >   is that it consisted of 4 quadrants of 90 degrees.
>
> No, the first thing that mathematicians noticed about the circle is
> that it's round.

LISTEN FELLOWS , WE have proven by precise numeration of 2 billion
consecutive prime numbers and other complex diagrams that mathematics
runs at 1:10 at the half line, and exactly 1:6 at divergent sides at
tan 19, overall divergence is 1/6+1/6=1/3 . The non collapsible bottem
is -1 tangent(1/10*1/6) exact. In terms of quadrants of the promordial
90 *4 , it does translate into a dead proportion of 18*20, which has
been superceded by the introduction of the number 3 , to (18+1 )(20-1)

Which makes for a live circle at 360+1, 19^2, and closed value at
18.974-- The most wonderful thing in inverse 19 which your great
Professor Escultura has acceded to as an understanding of tan 19 ,
and we have proved it plus produced an infinite sieve for prime
numbers , 2 billion done. All this is going into a bronze memorial, we
do not need to say more


Fermat to Forest Gump -- What is the difference between an angle and
a curve???


Forest Gump-- A circle has no stop sign, but at an angle there is a
stop sign , Sir !!!
From: bill on 18 Jun 2010 13:39
On Jun 17, 4:48 pm, "porky_pig...(a)my-deja.com" <porky_pig...(a)my-
deja.com> wrote:
> On Jun 17, 7:20 pm, bill <b92...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > IMMHO, 4X90 is the primordial proportion. The first
> >   thing that mathematicians noticed about the circle
> >   is that it consisted of 4 quadrants of 90 degrees.
>
> No, the first thing that mathematicians noticed about the circle is
> that it's round.

OK! My point was that 18X20 was probably not the
primordial proportion of a circle. Actually 90X4 came after C/D. So
PI may be the PP of a circle if there is such a thing.

From: porky_pig_jr on 18 Jun 2010 15:16
On Jun 18, 1:39 pm, bill <b92...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 17, 4:48 pm, "porky_pig...(a)my-deja.com" <porky_pig...(a)my-
>
> deja.com> wrote:
> > On Jun 17, 7:20 pm, bill <b92...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > IMMHO, 4X90 is the primordial proportion. The first
> > >   thing that mathematicians noticed about the circle
> > >   is that it consisted of 4 quadrants of 90 degrees.
>
> > No, the first thing that mathematicians noticed about the circle is
> > that it's round.
>
> OK!  My point was that 18X20 was probably not the
> primordial proportion of a circle.  Actually 90X4 came after C/D. So
> PI may be the PP of a circle if there is such a thing.

Sorry, my fault. I should have ended my post with a smiley :-)

 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: non-recursive countable ordinal
Next: CANTOR'S PROOF: An AD(n) =/= L(n,n) -> An AD(n) =/= L(n,n)