THE ORIGIN OF LIFE AFTER DEATH
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Simplifying Terms
Next: De Sitter's experiment and the relative motion of photons with respect to the surface of the star
From: bigfletch8 on 29 Jan 2010 06:29 On Jan 29, 9:32 am, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 28, 4:10 am, "Nowhe...(a)notspam.com" <George Hammond> wrote: > > > Who would be reading this BULLSHIT?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Did you decide it was b.s after reading it? If so, you have got your answer. BOfL
From: Jimbo on 29 Jan 2010 06:51 On Jan 29, 6:29 am, "bigflet...(a)gmail.com" <bigflet...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 29, 9:32 am, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 28, 4:10 am, "Nowhe...(a)notspam.com" <George Hammond> wrote: > > > Who would be reading this BULLSHIT?- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Did you decide it was b.s after reading it? > > If so, you have got your answer. > > BOfL I read it, and it was still simply opinion, it doesn't explain how this "computer" is powered, what happens during the rapid cellular degeneration after death, and a thousand more questions that would have to be answered for it to be a working theory. In other words, bullshit.
From: George Hammond on 29 Jan 2010 13:41 On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 03:29:25 -0800 (PST), "bigfletch8(a)gmail.com" <bigfletch8(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Jan 29, 9:32�am, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On Jan 28, 4:10�am, "Nowhe...(a)notspam.com" <George Hammond> wrote: >> > >> >> Who would be reading this BULLSHIT?- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > >Did you decide it was b.s after reading it? > >If so, you have got your answer. > >BOfL > [Hammond] Look Boffle, you're a graduate physicist and so am I. You know very well I wouldn't publish a scientific claim that wasn't credible science.. Post a legitimate scientific criticism or screw. ======================================== GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE Primary site http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond Mirror site http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 =======================================
From: Geopelia on 1 Feb 2010 15:46 "Yap" <hhyapster(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:59e9590a-c7e6-4871-9061-34166ee399ca(a)v20g2000prb.googlegroups.com... On Jan 28, 4:10 am, "Nowhe...(a)notspam.com" <George Hammond> wrote: > THE ORIGIN OF LIFE AFTER DEATH > > Amateurs are inclined to believe that the notion of life > after death is perhaps a euphemistic metaphor or even a > joke. One scientist told me that in his opinion the notion > of an afterlife is the "biggest oxymoron in history". > Fact of the matter is that an exhaustive survey of the > historical record shows that there is an entirely > legitimate, even scientifically logical, rationale for the > conjecture of life after death. > > I present here my conclusion as to where the historical > origin of the belief in life after death comes from. This > is as follows: > > 1. The existence of Heaven (the invisible world) was > discovered many thousands of years ago by direct observation > and experience and was certainly well known by the time of > the Pyramids. Trances, visions, hallucinations and common > schizophrenic visual phenomena made this a universally known > phenomenon, specially among the elite. Today most of > Psychology and most of the fine arts are based upon this > fact . Today of course we don't need Psychology to verify > the existence of the "invisible world". Simple and direct > laboratory measurement of the Picture Fusion Frequency (PFF) > clearly proves that as much as one third of the motion > visible to an adult is invisible to a child. This is caused > by simple age-related brain growth. Consequently, since > modern Auxology shows that the average adult is about 20% > short of full growth; 20% of reality is actually invisible > to the average adult person. Religion refers to this > "invisible world", which can now be precisely measured, as > "Heaven". > > 2. Meanwhile the universal prevalence of the nocturnal > dream was also well known to the ancients. > > 3. It was also recognized that knowlege of the existence of > this invisible world highly influences the form and content > of dreams. Dreams are clearly a symbolic representation of > this invisible world. This was recognized thousands of > years before Sigmund Freud identified it as a quasi > scientific theory of the relation of the "unconscious mind" > (aka the invisible world) as the causitive agent in > nocturnal dream formation. > > 4. Also it was early on recognized that there is a > relationship between sleep and death, namely that they are > the two most commonly known instances of unconsciousness. > Thanatos and Hypnos were twin brothers in Greek mythology > for instance. > > 5. So, over historical times the belief slowly emerged that > one actually went into this invisible world after death same > as we go into a nocturnal dream when we fall asleep. It was > logically conjectured that we go into a postmortem dream > state i.e. that one "went to heaven" when one died. This was > a universal belief for 3,000 years in the ancient Egyptian > religion for instance where the Pyramid texts are the > surviving historical record of it. This finally became > formalized during the Christian era and was written into the > New testament by St. Paul in I Corinthians chapter 15, vs. > 35-55. > > That, in a nut shell, is "where the theory of life after > death comes from". > > St. Paul describes it in First Corinthians: > > "In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, > at the last trump...the dead shall be raised" > ( I Corinthians 15:52) > > "... it is raised a spiritual body." > (I Corinthians 15:44) > > Interestingly the modern discovery of a > microtubule/cytoskeleton optical signaling system in the > brain now makes this conjecture quite scientifically > plausible. > > Sir Roger Penrose and Prof. Stuart Hammeroff have advanced > a widely known theory that microtubules within the neurons > of the brain consists of an enormous and fast optical > computer containing an additional 15 orders of magnitude of > computer power that was virtually unknown 20 years ago. > Research in this area is expanding rapidly and involves > thousands of scientists and many publications yearly. > I wrote Stuart Hammeroff not long ago and pointed out to > him that the cytoskeleton operates at optical frequencies > 1-billion times faster than neuronal firing frequency and > that therefore the brain's cytoskeleton could easily > download a year-long postmortem dream which would flood the > entire brain in a fraction of a second immediately after > death. Thus although the bedside of observers would see the > person expire in a fraction of a second, the dearly departed > could subjectively live on for a year in cyber-paradise > (Heaven) despite his millisecond second demise. > > Prof. Stuart Hammeroff sent an e-mail message back to me > the next day saying that he thought such a phenomenon was > "possible", and I remind you that comes from the world's > leading expert in microtubule function in the human brain! > > So clearly, such a mechanism would replicate EXACTLY St. > Paul's historical description of the phenomenon of life > after death. > > It appears to me that there has been an entirely new > scientific light put on the question of life after death. > > Any serious scientific comment is welcomed. > ======================================== > GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE > Primary sitehttp://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond > Mirror site > http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com > HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto > http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 > ======================================= Who would be reading this BULLSHIT? Me. I find it interesting to while away a few idle minutes. Now I'm off to play a bit of Tetris.
From: Jimbo on 17 Feb 2010 08:18
On Jan 29, 1:49 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 03:51:54 -0800 (PST), Jimbo > > > > > > <ckdbig...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >On Jan 29, 6:29 am, "bigflet...(a)gmail.com" <bigflet...(a)gmail.com> > >wrote: > >> On Jan 29, 9:32 am, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > On Jan 28, 4:10 am, "Nowhe...(a)notspam.com" <George Hammond> wrote: > > >> > Who would be reading this BULLSHIT?- Hide quoted text - > > >> > - Show quoted text - > > >> Did you decide it was b.s after reading it? > > >> If so, you have got your answer. > > >> BOfL > > >I read it, and it was still simply opinion, it doesn't explain how > >this "computer" is powered, what happens during the rapid cellular > >degeneration after death, > > [Hammond] > Don't be naieve. ALL those questions have been answered. Nonsense. |