THE QUEST FOR THE ULTIMATE THEORY OF TIME, AN INTRODUCTION TO IRREVERSIBILITY
in [Relativity]
|
From: G. L. Bradford on 22 May 2010 15:06 "Juan R. González-Álvarez" <nowhere(a)canonicalscience.com> wrote in message news:pan.2010.05.21.17.03.13(a)canonicalscience.com... > ########################################################## > THE QUEST FOR THE ULTIMATE THEORY OF TIME, AN INTRODUCTION > TO IRREVERSIBILITY > ########################################################## > (snip) ================= There is a finite limit to seeing OUT and BACK, and that horizon of limit is a constant of collapse. A CONSTANT! The "out" and "back" limit -- the horizon of "collapse" -- is like any other of its kind, an 'event horizon'. A CONSTANT of event horizon. But don't go beyond it.....to Singularity. Now go forward to the "limit." Go forward to the "collapse." Go forward to the "event horizon." Go forward to the "CONSTANT!" But don't go beyond it.....to singularity (to Singularity). A CONSTANT of the [wheel], and [wheels], of time turning. Verse. Versum. Versa. Versus. Turn. Turns. To turn. Curve. Curves. To curve. To look straight up and out into -- and through -- strings of curvature to [THE] Event Horizon of event horizons: To look forward up, out, back, down, in, to the Planck horizon. To look, in fact, into a [singularly] perfect mirror, thus a worldview 2-dimensional single-sided only. That particular past horizon also being the future horizon, now (now = now). That particular future also being the past, now (now = now). [Singularly] so. A singularity (including the infinite Singularity of singularities // the infinite Universe of universes). What is the difference between 'mass' and 'space' (including infinitesimal-infinite mass and infinitesimal-infinite space) after leaving out 'event horizon' ('event horizons')? What is the difference between the malleability of mass and the malleability of space? None but the malleability of singularity and event horizon (of singularities and event horizons macro and micro)? Just don't go beyond the event horizon (beyond the event horizons) to the singularity (thus to [THE] Singularity). Don't go beyond detail to that which is beyond detail (is all of an infinite detail all at once....thus ever more toooo densely packed of detail; thus apparently emptying of detail (smoothing out). Don't go beyond complex to that which is beyond complex (which is all of an infinite complexity all at once....thus ever more toooo densely packed of complexity; thus apparently emptying of complexity (becoming toooo simple). (|||||||| --> |||| --> || --> | --> .) (|||||||| <-- |||| <-- || <-- | <-- .) (|||||||| <(> . <)> ||||||||) (. <(> |||||||| <)> .) GLB =================
From: G. L. Bradford on 25 May 2010 03:46 "Juan R. González-Álvarez" <nowhere(a)canonicalscience.com> wrote in message news:pan.2010.05.24.14.37.53(a)canonicalscience.com... > G. L. Bradford wrote on Sat, 22 May 2010 15:06:20 -0400: > >> "Juan R. González-Álvarez" <nowhere(a)canonicalscience.com> wrote in >> message news:pan.2010.05.21.17.03.13(a)canonicalscience.com... >>> ########################################################## THE QUEST >>> FOR THE ULTIMATE THEORY OF TIME, AN INTRODUCTION TO IRREVERSIBILITY >>> ########################################################## >>> >>> >> (snip) >> >> ================= > > Apart from snipping all my message (including links and references to > textbooks > and monographs) you submit a lot of NONSENSE, without even noticing that > the > general theory of irreversibility promised in the message is valid for > generalied > dynamical regimes where the concepts of "horizon", "singularity", and > "collapse" do > not apply... > > -- ================== What you pushed out front was "The Ultimate Theory Of Time." An instant later that was not at all what you were delivering. GLB ==================
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Proof: Universe not expanding faster Next: The geometric center of gravity |