THEORY OF LIFE AFTER DEATH
in [Physics]
|
Prev: What will Astronuts do on Mars?
Next: Forcing Electrons into Superconducting Line Researchers created a"pseudo gap"
From: George Hammond on 28 Jan 2010 13:36 Copyright: George Hammond 1-20-2010 ==================================== NOTE: This research document is posted on the Usenet newsgroups both because it is news and because it is appropriate to the target newsgroups. It is posted for pro bono humanitarian reasons as well as national security concerns, as well as to publicly document and secure the author's priorities in discovery and his copyright. No credible or competent commentary can be expected from the anonymous amateurs on these newsgroups, but hopefully the document will eventually reach the hands of competent individuals via global Internet circulation. ==================================== THEORY OF LIFE AFTER DEATH It is now my conclusion that dreams are actually caused by the brain growth deficit. If there were no brain growth deficit we wouldn't dream. Everyone is agreed that dreams are pathological. Life after death is also pathological. And the underlying pathology in both cases is the Secular Trend growth deficit. Basically the microtubule signal cannot be fully displayed at the neuronal level because of the growth deficit, a simple shortage of neurons. Therefore the cytoskeleton signal continues to bombard the neuronal system seeking expression. At night when the visual system flat lines because our eyes are closed this bombardment activates visual recall and a symbolic version of the cytoskeleton signal is displayed. In life after death a similar phenomena occurs only it occurs in reverse. In life after death the entire neuronal system flat lines so the bombarding microtubule signal tries to activate general memory by retrieving the dendritic information structure, naturally nothing occurs at the neuronal level. However the microtubule system uses this recalled memory at the microtubule level to formulate a reverse-dream, that is an un-curved version of the retrieved dendritic memory. Meanwhile, consciousness itself which is composed of two signals under normal circumstances, a large overwhelming neuronal complement and a small unnoticeable microtubule complement- now becomes composed by default of nothing but the small microtubule complement. And what is seen in this microtubule consciousness level is simply a reverse-dream whereby the retrieval of memory from the dendritic microtubule structure now becomes un-curved at the microtubule level and is displayed as (beatific, flat) life after death, so-called. The script for this life after death dream must be based on a hierarchy of priorities of some kind. The first priority of course would be to immediately ascend into a full-blown vision, an overall vision, of your entire life is viewed in flat space-time. This would be a Beatific Vision of your entire life. This must happen immediately in the first few minutes of the afterlife experience. We know from the speed of light that the minimum stay in heaven is about 15 minutes. So in the first 15 minutes you must obtain the final judgment so-called as to whether you're going to Heaven are going to Hell or spending time in Purgatory or whatever. After that assuming that you didn't get hit by an A-bomb and you're going to spend more than 15 minutes in Heaven, I would suppose that some kind of a more detailed life review begins to transpire. A microsecond dilates into about 10 days and a millisecond dilates into about 30 years. Under normal circumstances I assume that your normal stay in Heaven is somewhat proportional to the growth deficit that you experience during life. For the average person this could work out to certainly months and even years. But even the unfortunate souls at ground zero at Hiroshima who were killed in a nano-second by a gamma ray burst we are now assured, got to heaven for at least 15 minutes. This is sufficient time to secure eternal life. Dreams are caused by the growth deficit. The microtubule system is the source of the dreams and it keeps sending a signal to the neuronal system but the neuronal system has a shortfall therefore it can only display a symbolic representation of the actual signal. So the reason we dream is because the microtubule system has been unsuccessful all day long in sending and getting the true un-curved signal displayed by the neuronal system. So when you close your eyes and shut off the visual system it is constantly impinging a residual signal from the cytoskeleton which can't be displayed which causes a symbolic representation to be seen during sleep and this is a dream. Now the same mechanism is what causes life after death. When the neuronal system flat lines it is similar to going to sleep when the visual system flat lines at night. The microtubule system is still trying to send the flat space signal to the neuronal system however the neuronal system no longer exists so therefore consciousness descends by default to the microtubule level and this experience is life after death so-called. A dream is only a symbolic representation of the true microtubule signal. Now the question is what is life after death. Death flatlining must be similar to visual flatlining during sleep. During sleep the microtubule action causes the visual memory system to be called, but because it is asleep (temproarily flatlined), the microtubule system begins to "visually dream" and this dream is displayed symbolically by the neuronal system. So therefore after death (total) flatlining, the microtubule signal must activltly retrieve the general memory of the brain via the dendritic hardwired system. So in fact, the microtubule system begins to dream, but now in all 5-senses, not just visual. But we must assume a reverse procedure happens in life after death. The microtubule system recalls a memory from the fixed dendrite system but then un-curves it at the microtubule level where it is experienced as a life after death dream state. On the other hand a nocturnal dream is a neuronal process which curves an un-curved impinging pent-up cytoskeleton signal and turns it into a symbolic form because of the curvature. Dreams are a symbolic version of the invisible world, while life after death is an un-symbolic version of memory recall at the neuronal dendritic level which is un-curved and experienced as true flat space at the microtubule level. Life after death is essentially reversed-dreaming. It is RETRO-DREAMING. Actually, Life After Death is exactly a form of dreaming, only the LAD dream is seen at the cytoskeleton level, rather than the neuronal level which is where a nocturnal dream is seen. Both processes are CAUSED by a "flatlining" of part (dreams) or all (LAD) of the neuronal system. ADDITIONAL NOTES: It is quite common in dreams to see a chimera, that is particular face composed of two different identifiable persons. My interpretation of this is that it that it is a symbolic representation of the growth deficit. In other words one face represents a higher version of the lower face. This tells me that the microtubule system is trying to display a person's true (un-curved) identity but finds it impossible because of the neuron shortfall so therefore it engineers a symbolic chimera whereby it combines two faces one of higher and one of lower growth curved + un-curved versions). This is why I believe life after death is a retro-dream process. If the neuronal system is alive it has to concoct a chimera, but if the neuronal system is flatlined then it undergoes a retro-process whereby it retrieves a memory from the dendritic structure and then un-curves it into flat space-time and actually sees the true identity of the person, a beatific vision or a beatific version of the person who was seen during real-life. To sum it all up: Neuronal flatlining is the cause of both dreams and LAD. In dreams, the un-curved dream is occurinjg at the microtubule level but is seen at the neuronal level, and therefore is curved. But in LAD the process cannot be seen at the neuronal level because of brain death (total flatline) therefore ONLY the microtubule version of the dream obtains (default) consciousness which is now exclusively at the cytoskeletal level, and naturally is an un-curved version, or "Beatific" version of the dream. Hence the life after death dream represents flat-spacetime reality, or "eternal life" so called. ======================================== GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE Primary site http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond Mirror site http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 =======================================
From: Rock Brentwood on 1 Feb 2010 22:13 On Jan 28, 4:37 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote: > > In life after death the entire neuronal system flat lines so the bombarding microtubule signal ... > Argle bargle pudding and pie, > Georgie Hammond is in his sty. The problem I have with this or any "explanation" along these lines is the petty physicalism of it or its attempt to reduce it to mechanistic phenomena of ANY kind. There is a lot more in the physical world than the merely "physical", when "physical" is defined in terms still stuck in a 19th century frame of mind, modulo a veneer of newage-ist everything-weird-is- quantum nonsense. This issue, like all the other major open issues, requires going back to fundamentals. By "fundamentals" I do NOT mean, "fundamentals in light of the new paradigms", but I mean that: the job of even devising CLASSICAL physics is yet to be complete! That is, classical theory is incomplete even as an account for a classical world. If there had been no quantum theory and no relativity and if the world were truly classical, the then-going theory of the late 19th century would STILL be woefully lacking! Many of the present-day issues that are falsely identified as problems with relativity and quantum theory have absolutely nothing to do with either, but are classically rooted. They were merely inherited by the latter-day paradigms, but are neither originating from quantum or relativistic theory, nor resolved therein. They are classical in origin and in resolution. That includes the problem of time, the problem underlying the no interaction theorem and Haag's theorem, the so-called "ultraviolet divergence", the problem with "singularities". All of these have their origin in inadequacies in the structure of classical theory; their appearances across the paradigm boundary c. 1900-1905 in quantum theory or relativity as "problems with divergences" or "problems with singularities" being inheritances, not origins. The question on hand is what happens after death. What lies at the very root of this question is the even deeper question of what happens BEFORE death -- that is: how and why we even perceive time as (a) directional and (b) moving in a given direction in the first place; and (c) what meaning is the "here and how" in the first place for anyone to be "dying". Before you can have death or life you have to have a here and now that moves forward, and it has to have a special meaning. But there's no "cursor" in the universe -- neither in classical theory, nor in relativistic theory ... nor (for that matter) even in quantum theory. Or, so that's the usual assumption. Actually, however, there is. There is something that distinguishes each event in space-time from all others: its horizon. The horizon is the intersection of the past light cone with Time 0. At the point of intersection, the light cone is tangent and flattens out. But its most significant feature is that (as best as anyone knows) it encompasses a finite volume. Moreover, at each point and time in the Universe, the horizon encompasses a different subset of the Time 0 surface. So, now you have the right foundation to begin asking questions of what happens after crossing over to the quantum paradigm. In the quantum world, a horizon produces a "cutoff" of state space into relative states. The cutoff is obtained by "averaging over" all the modes outside the horizon. Two state spaces associated with two different horizons cannot be completely transformed into one another. A complete transformation between state spaces (at least in field theory) is called a Bogoliubov Transformation. When the two state spaces have different horizons, the Bogoliubov Transformation is incomplete. The net result is each state space sees the other as (at least partly) thermalized. Pure states in one are mixed in the other. Associated with each horizon is, thus, an entanglement entropy -- the entropy associated with the cutoff. As you move up a worldline away from Time 0, each point has a horizon that contains the horizons of all the preceding points. The result a net increase in entanglement entropy. As you move away from time 0, the associated state space grows larger, as more and more field modes that formerly lay outside the horizon are now contained within. The result is a progressive increase in "determinism". Futures that were uncertain become more and more resolved as you move up the worldline. The effect is like a cursor engrained in spacetime: each point on the manifold having its own state space, such that along each timelike worldline the state space gets progressively larger. The incompleteness and flaw in CLASSICAL theory that appears here, associated with this is this: we're using the Noether Theorem the wrong way. The Noether Theorem does NOT generally hold for "all space". It can only be formulated for compact regions. Moreover, when done on a scale that purports to apply all the universe, either (a) the compact region has to hhave "side-bounds" (a time-like part to its boundary surface) or (b) it has to have a "horizon". Only in case (b) can conservation laws be formulated. The punchline: the conserved quantities mentioned in the conservation laws are NOT constant -- they're functions of the horizon. Thus, if J is a Noether current (represented as a 3-form), the actual conservation law would read: Q(t) = integral_{W(t)} (J) where W(t) is a family of space-like surfaces that each share the same boundary Bdy(W(t)) = H = horizon. Then, given the corresponding continuity equation dJ = 0, (assuming each W(t) is simply connected) one can find a "superpotential" j such that dj = J. The integral then reduces to: Q(t) = integral_{W(t)} (dj) = integral_H (j) = Q_H. It's constant in t, but NOT in H. Thus, each event in spacetime has its own set of conserved quantities and its own set of Noether laws. Each observer and each "here and now" is a "cursor".
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 10 Feb 2010 04:44
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:36:13 -0500, George Hammond <Nowhere1(a)notspam.com> wrote: >Copyright: George Hammond 1-20-2010 > >==================================== >NOTE: This research document is posted on the Usenet >newsgroups both because it is news and because it is >appropriate to the target newsgroups. > >It is posted for pro bono humanitarian reasons as well as >national security concerns, as well as to publicly document >and secure the author's priorities in discovery and his >copyright. > >No credible or competent commentary can be expected from the >anonymous amateurs on these newsgroups, but hopefully the >document will eventually reach the hands of competent >individuals via global Internet circulation. >==================================== > > > THEORY OF LIFE AFTER DEATH > > It is now my conclusion that dreams are actually caused >by the brain growth deficit. If there were no brain growth >deficit we wouldn't dream. Everyone is agreed that dreams >are pathological. Life after death is also pathological. And >the underlying pathology in both cases is the Secular Trend >growth deficit. > > Basically the microtubule signal cannot be fully >displayed at the neuronal level because of the growth >deficit, a simple shortage of neurons. Therefore the >cytoskeleton signal continues to bombard the neuronal system >seeking expression. At night when the visual system flat >lines because our eyes are closed this bombardment activates >visual recall and a symbolic version of the cytoskeleton >signal is displayed. > > In life after death a similar phenomena occurs only it >occurs in reverse. In life after death the entire neuronal >system flat lines so the bombarding microtubule signal tries >to activate general memory by retrieving the dendritic >information structure, naturally nothing occurs at the >neuronal level. However the microtubule system uses this >recalled memory at the microtubule level to formulate a >reverse-dream, that is an un-curved version of the retrieved >dendritic memory. Meanwhile, consciousness itself which is >composed of two signals under normal circumstances, a large >overwhelming neuronal complement and a small unnoticeable >microtubule complement- now becomes composed by default of >nothing but the small microtubule complement. And what is >seen in this microtubule consciousness level is simply a >reverse-dream whereby the retrieval of memory from the >dendritic microtubule structure now becomes un-curved at the >microtubule level and is displayed as (beatific, flat) life >after death, so-called. The script for this life after death >dream must be based on a hierarchy of priorities of some >kind. The first priority of course would be to immediately >ascend into a full-blown vision, an overall vision, of your >entire life is viewed in flat space-time. This would be a >Beatific Vision of your entire life. This must happen >immediately in the first few minutes of the afterlife >experience. We know from the speed of light that the minimum >stay in heaven is about 15 minutes. So in the first 15 >minutes you must obtain the final judgment so-called as to >whether you're going to Heaven are going to Hell or spending >time in Purgatory or whatever. After that assuming that you >didn't get hit by an A-bomb and you're going to spend more >than 15 minutes in Heaven, I would suppose that some kind of >a more detailed life review begins to transpire. A >microsecond dilates into about 10 days and a millisecond >dilates into about 30 years. Under normal circumstances I >assume that your normal stay in Heaven is somewhat >proportional to the growth deficit that you experience >during life. For the average person this could work out to >certainly months and even years. But even the unfortunate >souls at ground zero at Hiroshima who were killed in a >nano-second by a gamma ray burst we are now assured, got to >heaven for at least 15 minutes. This is sufficient time to >secure eternal life. > > Dreams are caused by the growth deficit. The microtubule >system is the source of the dreams and it keeps sending a >signal to the neuronal system but the neuronal system has a >shortfall therefore it can only display a symbolic >representation of the actual signal. So the reason we dream >is because the microtubule system has been unsuccessful all >day long in sending and getting the true un-curved signal >displayed by the neuronal system. So when you close your >eyes and shut off the visual system it is constantly >impinging a residual signal from the cytoskeleton which >can't be displayed which causes a symbolic representation to >be seen during sleep and this is a dream. > > Now the same mechanism is what causes life after death. >When the neuronal system flat lines it is similar to going >to sleep when the visual system flat lines at night. The >microtubule system is still trying to send the flat space >signal to the neuronal system however the neuronal system no >longer exists so therefore consciousness descends by default >to the microtubule level and this experience is life after >death so-called. > > A dream is only a symbolic representation of the true >microtubule signal. Now the question is what is life after >death. Death flatlining must be similar to visual flatlining >during sleep. During sleep the microtubule action causes the >visual memory system to be called, but because it is asleep >(temproarily flatlined), the microtubule system begins to >"visually dream" and this dream is displayed symbolically by >the neuronal system. So therefore after death (total) >flatlining, the microtubule signal must activltly retrieve >the general memory of the brain via the dendritic hardwired >system. So in fact, the microtubule system begins to dream, >but now in all 5-senses, not just visual. But we must assume >a reverse procedure happens in life after death. The >microtubule system recalls a memory from the fixed dendrite >system but then un-curves it at the microtubule level where >it is experienced as a life after death dream state. On the >other hand a nocturnal dream is a neuronal process which >curves an un-curved impinging pent-up cytoskeleton signal >and turns it into a symbolic form because of the curvature. >Dreams are a symbolic version of the invisible world, while >life after death is an un-symbolic version of memory recall >at the neuronal dendritic level which is un-curved and >experienced as true flat space at the microtubule level. >Life after death is essentially reversed-dreaming. It is >RETRO-DREAMING. > Actually, Life After Death is exactly a form of dreaming, >only the LAD dream is seen at the cytoskeleton level, rather >than the neuronal level which is where a nocturnal dream is >seen. Both processes are CAUSED by a "flatlining" of part >(dreams) or all (LAD) of the neuronal system. > > >ADDITIONAL NOTES: > > It is quite common in dreams to see a chimera, that is >particular face composed of two different identifiable >persons. My interpretation of this is that it that it is a >symbolic representation of the growth deficit. In other >words one face represents a higher version of the lower >face. This tells me that the microtubule system is trying to >display a person's true (un-curved) identity but finds it >impossible because of the neuron shortfall so therefore it >engineers a symbolic chimera whereby it combines two faces >one of higher and one of lower growth curved + un-curved >versions). This is why I believe life after death is a >retro-dream process. If the neuronal system is alive it has >to concoct a chimera, but if the neuronal system is >flatlined then it undergoes a retro-process whereby it >retrieves a memory from the dendritic structure and then >un-curves it into flat space-time and actually sees the true >identity of the person, a beatific vision or a beatific >version of the person who was seen during real-life. > > > To sum it all up: Neuronal flatlining is the cause of >both dreams and LAD. In dreams, the un-curved dream is >occurinjg at the microtubule level but is seen at the >neuronal level, and therefore is curved. But in LAD the >process cannot be seen at the neuronal level because of >brain death (total flatline) therefore ONLY the microtubule >version of the dream obtains (default) consciousness which >is now exclusively at the cytoskeletal level, and naturally >is an un-curved version, or "Beatific" version of the dream. >Hence the life after death dream represents flat-spacetime >reality, or "eternal life" so called. >======================================== >GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE > Primary site >http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond > Mirror site > http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com > HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto > http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 >======================================= George, I have experienced DEATH 27959 times. .....the only difference is that I wake up in the morning. Henry Wilson... ........provider of free physics lessons |