Prev: axis of rotation (very simple question)
Next: Europe Proton Collider DENY Black Hole
From: Freedom Man on 12 Jun 2010 13:33
The media are closely watched by the CIA and other "intelligence" agencies.
These agencies control, usually in subtle ways, what does and does not get
printed or broadcast. Disinformation they plant gets published as fact, and
factual incidents are declared as false or discredited by more subtle means.
If the deaf, dumb, and blind Sheeple ever wake up, there will be a day of
reckoning for America!

Didn't someone once say that 200 years is far too long to go without a
revolution?
"Independence Day" is coming -


From: Cwatters on 12 Jun 2010 15:27

"Ed" <up_yours517(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c710289e-65d8-4404-8d9f-e3038ac1c844(a)c10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> The planes, if they indeed existed and were not inserted into videos
> in the hours after each tower exploded,

Rather a lot of people saw the second impact with their own eyes or on live
TV. They were alerted that something was going on by the first impact.



From: Androcles on 12 Jun 2010 15:33

"Cwatters" <colin.wattersNOSPAM(a)TurnersOakNOSPAM.plus.com> wrote in message
news:C66dnVbqlekkQo7RnZ2dnUVZ8tWdnZ2d(a)brightview.co.uk...
|
| "Ed" <up_yours517(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
| news:c710289e-65d8-4404-8d9f-e3038ac1c844(a)c10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
| > The planes, if they indeed existed and were not inserted into videos
| > in the hours after each tower exploded,
|
| Rather a lot of people saw the second impact with their own eyes or on
live
| TV. They were alerted that something was going on by the first impact.
|
That wasn't live TV, they were fossil planes as old as coal.




From: george on 12 Jun 2010 16:25
On Jun 13, 12:24 am, Ed <up_yours...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> <
> "All the news that's fit to print."
> <
> You''ll find this message on the New York Times front page every
> edition.
> <
> But how about when it makes mistakes?
> <
> You have to see Page A-2 in a future edition to read
> a correction.

Silly boy.
Did they say when that edition would be printed?
It is a -future- edition....
and errors and omissions are scarcely news


From: spudnik on 12 Jun 2010 16:40
nanothermite is a joke;
what'd you expect, when an aluminum-alloy plane
hits a steel-girdered building with prejudice?

thus&so:
see S. Fred Singer's retrospective metastudy of glaciers;
think ye, all are in retreat -- do I now or have I ever worked
for an oil company, or will I, iff the price is good?

thus&so:
the primary effect of increased CO2 is not on the temperature;
it is on the evaporation of water, whence transported and
largely released to space at the poles as heat of fusion,
internediated by Hadley cells etc. ... and, of course,
H2Ois the #1 glass house gas, and clouds are really hard
to model, and no-one has modeled a typical glass house
*at a particular latitude*, after Ahrrenius won the first Nobel
(in chemistry?) for some thing, else.

thus&so:
why do *you* believe,
that oilcos are against cap&trade?

thus&so:
I looked on the blog with the older article, and
the earliest replies (February) were from Ferenc,
where he posts mail from his "Boss at NASA," apparently saying
that he wanted him to withdraw it from the obscure Hungarian journal,
and submit it to two, well-known journals. he also stated that
he was fired.

thus&so:
outside of Quaternary Period studies,
there is a loose langauge about "the Pleistocene," and
even a calibration due only to the Local *stadia*
of just one (the previous) glacial phase (Wisconsin e.g.;
it's different in the former SU/Europe).

> It takes about 3 decades to establish a global climate trend.
http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/msu/t2lt/tltglhmam_5.3
http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

thus&so:
there is also "transportative heat flow," viz, rain on the roof.
photons are bogus rocks o'massless light; wouldn't it
be more correct, to say that a vibrational mode is excited,
when a wave of light matches its (sub- or super-) frequency,
electromagnetically, via electronic orbitals?

thus&so:
I read a review of a recent book by Buzz Aldrin,
stating that he and the crew of Apollo#x and a bunch of dignitaries
from the SU and Japan & so forth, were feted by a picnic at the North
Pole;
so, how did they get, there?
> http://igloo.atmos.uiuc.edu/cgi-bin/test/print.sh?fm=09&fd=22&fy=1980...

thus&so:
well, would the EPA be promulgating the "enabling code"
for BP's cap&trade free-maket spazzm?
y'know, poor Rep. Waxman really believes in this ****, because
it worked so well in '91 on acid rain, supposedly; maybe,
he's just been at it too long & lobbied by too many oilcos and
drugcos (his committee also ran the Healthcare bill,
which is only one segment of the Stupid, economy .-)
so, why can't we just have a tiny carbon tax, instead --
is it really "pollitically impossible," as the WSUrinal and
the emmissions-trading-scheme people, say?
if Dubya had known that Kyoto was just a cap&trade nostrum
of free trade, free beer, freedom in teh free market,
would he have signed it?

thus&so:
is this the same as the quasi-defunct dataset of the 28 coterminous
stations
of the U.S. Reference Climate Network, which showed a one-degree
cooling,
when I first heard of it ... a long time, ago?

thus&so:
Russels's paradoxi are all equivalent, "I am the only Solopsist,
existentially; therefore, there is only (one) Universe at the
momentbeing."

thus&so:
see the retrospective metastudy on glaciers by S. Fred Singer (and,
it is certainly fun to ask, Did he work for an oil company?, and
not bother with his awesome vitae, cuz he sold his soul to rock-
oil .-)

thus&so:
that's entirely "sylli," where all known properties of
electromagnetism,
which are wavey, dysappear into a loose hydrodynamic metaphor,
replacing "energy" with "aether" -- a quaint mental spazzm. funny, as
all of this could be exposed, merely by taking some aspect
of a real two-hole experiment, like the actual details
of the uncited fullerene set-up, into account.
waves can ne'er be particles, whether a mathematical duality can
be applied in a formularium of light a la momentum; for instance,
How is a water-wave to be known as a particle ... um, a hydron?...
well,
clearly, a soliton might seem like that; and,
there was a tsunami quite recently, that appeared
only to hit Half Moon Bay, CA, USA. when Moonlight hits your rod,
like a big piece o'sod, that's the corpuscular theory of light!
look at his sad nonsequiters; yours are only misnomers & oxymora
("global" warming, when insolation is totally differential
from pole to equator e.g.). and, so, What'd you "understood of the
following?"
> A=Mc^2, where A is aether and M is matter,
> the following is easily understood: "If a body gives off the energy L
> in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2."

--Stop BP's and Waxman's arbitrageurs' wetdream "Captain Tax as
according to the God-am WSUrinal" -- and they LOVE his '91 bill!
http://wlym.com
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: axis of rotation (very simple question)
Next: Europe Proton Collider DENY Black Hole