From: John Jones on
John Jones wrote:
> Pentcho Valev wrote:
>> Theoretically, the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment can
>> be obtained by assuming that:
>>
>> (A) The speed of light varies with the speed of the light source (c'=c
>> +v); the principle of relativity is correct; there are no miracles
>> (length contraction, time dilation).
>>
>> (B) Einstein's 1905 light postulate (c'=c) is correct; the principle
>> of relativity is correct; there are miracles (length contraction, time
>> dilation).
>>
>> There is no reasonable third alternative. That is, Newton's emission
>> theory of light with its constitutive equation c'=c+v is the ONLY
>> alternative to special relativity. Moreover, the emission theory is
>> TRUE and special relativity FALSE unless one finds natural that a
>> long train can be trapped inside a short tunnel, an 80m long pole can
>> be trapped inside a 40m long barn and a bug can be both dead and
>> alive:
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSRIyDfo_mY&mode=related&search
>>
>> http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/barn_pole.html
>> "These are the props. You own a barn, 40m long, with automatic doors
>> at either end, that can be opened and closed simultaneously by a
>> switch. You also have a pole, 80m long, which of course won't fit in
>> the barn. Now someone takes the pole and tries to run (at nearly the
>> speed of light) through the barn with the pole horizontal. Special
>> Relativity (SR) says that a moving object is contracted in the
>> direction of motion: this is called the Lorentz Contraction. So, if
>> the pole is set in motion lengthwise, then it will contract in the
>> reference frame of a stationary observer.....So, as the pole passes
>> through the barn, there is an instant when it is completely within the
>> barn. At that instant, you close both doors simultaneously, with your
>> switch. Of course, you open them again pretty quickly, but at least
>> momentarily you had the contracted pole shut up in your barn. The
>> runner emerges from the far door unscathed.....If the doors are kept
>> shut the rod will obviously smash into the barn door at one end. If
>> the door withstands this the leading end of the rod will come to rest
>> in the frame of reference of the stationary observer. There can be no
>> such thing as a rigid rod in relativity so the trailing end will not
>> stop immediately and the rod will be compressed beyond the amount it
>> was Lorentz contracted. If it does not explode under the strain and it
>> is sufficiently elastic it will come to rest and start to spring back
>> to its natural shape but since it is too big for the barn the other
>> end is now going to crash into the back door and the rod will be
>> trapped in a compressed state inside the barn."
>>
>> http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/Relativ/bugrivet.html
>> "The bug-rivet paradox is a variation on the twin paradox and is
>> similar to the pole-barn paradox.....The end of the rivet hits the
>> bottom of the hole before the head of the rivet hits the wall. So it
>> looks like the bug is squashed.....All this is nonsense from the bug's
>> point of view. The rivet head hits the wall when the rivet end is just
>> 0.35 cm down in the hole! The rivet doesn't get close to the
>> bug....The paradox is not resolved."
>>
>> Pentcho Valev
>> pvalev(a)yahoo.com