From: Magnus Hagander on
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Florian Pflug <fgp(a)phlo.org> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just tried to checkout REL9_0_BETA1 from my local clone of the GIT repository at git.postgresql.org and discovered that none of the tags from CVS seem to exist in there. For alpha1 to alpha1 each tag is accompanied by a corresponding brach, and those *do* exist on the GIT mirror. For beta1, however, no branch seems to exist, and hence there is no trace of it on the GIT mirror.
>
> Why is there a branch plus a tag for alphas, but only a tag for betas? I'd have assumed that both would just be tags, but obviously I'm missing something there...

I think we branched the alphas so we could version-stamp them while
keeping HEAD as "9.0devel". But when we switch to beta, we don't have
a devel tree anymore, it's just beta and backbranches.


--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: David Christensen on

On May 12, 2010, at 1:43 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Florian Pflug <fgp(a)phlo.org> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I just tried to checkout REL9_0_BETA1 from my local clone of the GIT repository at git.postgresql.org and discovered that none of the tags from CVS seem to exist in there. For alpha1 to alpha1 each tag is accompanied by a corresponding brach, and those *do* exist on the GIT mirror. For beta1, however, no branch seems to exist, and hence there is no trace of it on the GIT mirror.
>>
>> Why is there a branch plus a tag for alphas, but only a tag for betas? I'd have assumed that both would just be tags, but obviously I'm missing something there...
>
> I think we branched the alphas so we could version-stamp them while
> keeping HEAD as "9.0devel". But when we switch to beta, we don't have
> a devel tree anymore, it's just beta and backbranches.


Is there anything to do about the missing tags in git? I've wished for those to be available as well.

Regards,

David
--
David Christensen
End Point Corporation
david(a)endpoint.com





--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: Andrew Dunstan on


David Christensen wrote:
>
> Is there anything to do about the missing tags in git? I've wished for those to be available as well.
>
>
>

Sure, fix fromcvs to emit them. How is your ruby?

cheers

andrew

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: Florian Pflug on
On May 12, 2010, at 21:52 , Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> David Christensen wrote:
>>
>> Is there anything to do about the missing tags in git? I've wished for those to be available as well.
>>
>
> Sure, fix fromcvs to emit them. How is your ruby?


Where does one find the version of fromcvs used to feed git.postgresql.org? I might give it a shot.

I can't promise anything, though - my ruby-fu is OK, but my cvs-fu is badly lacking...

best regards,
Florian Pflug


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: Tom Lane on
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(a)dunslane.net> writes:
> David Christensen wrote:
>> Is there anything to do about the missing tags in git? I've wished for those to be available as well.

> Sure, fix fromcvs to emit them. How is your ruby?

Per Magnus' comment, there isn't anything "missing". We don't make
branches for beta releases. (Personally I'm thinking that having stub
branches for the alphas was a mistake too --- obviously, it's leading to
confusion.)

regards, tom lane

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers