From: Karl E. Peterson on 3 Nov 2009 19:45 Karl E. Peterson wrote: > Chris Dunaway wrote: >> On Nov 2, 2:11 pm, "Karl E. Peterson" <k...(a)exmvps.org> wrote: >>> John Smith wrote: >>> > I will need to update files related to my project regularly (through a >>> > separate downloader) and would like to store everything in some sort of >>> > container that can't be edited or modified on the client's machine. How >>> > should I go about this? >>> >>> Alternate Data Streams? >> >> Can VB6 open an Alternate Data Stream? > > Here ya go: http://vb.mvps.org/samples/Streams/ > > I'd be interested in feedback from any/all! And... Classic VB: Master a Little-Known Quirk of NTFS -- Visual Studio Magazine http://visualstudiomagazine.com/Articles/2009/11/03/Inside-Alternative-Data-Streams.aspx -- ..NET: It's About Trust! http://vfred.mvps.org
From: Larry Serflaten on 3 Nov 2009 19:27 "Karl E. Peterson" <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote > >>> Alternate Data Streams? > >> > >> Can VB6 open an Alternate Data Stream? > > > > Here ya go: http://vb.mvps.org/samples/Streams/ > > > > I'd be interested in feedback from any/all! You might have mentioned that MS may pull the rug out, so to speak, in future OS's... http://support.microsoft.com/kb/105763 LFS
From: Karl E. Peterson on 3 Nov 2009 21:06 Larry Serflaten wrote: > "Karl E. Peterson" <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote > >> >>> Alternate Data Streams? >> >> >> >> Can VB6 open an Alternate Data Stream? >> > >> > Here ya go: http://vb.mvps.org/samples/Streams/ >> > >> > I'd be interested in feedback from any/all! > > You might have mentioned that MS may pull the rug out, so to speak, in > future OS's... > > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/105763 Okay, first off, let's notice that this article was written for NT 3.1, eh? And, what they say is that ADS *may* not be supported in future *file* systems, not future *operating* systems. They do say that NTFS will continue to be supported in future versions of NT, as well. So I think saying it "works in NTFS" is pretty accurate, Big Picture-wise, don't you? -- ..NET: It's About Trust! http://vfred.mvps.org
From: Larry Serflaten on 3 Nov 2009 20:42 "Karl E. Peterson" <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote > > You might have mentioned that MS may pull the rug out, so to speak, in > > future OS's... > > > > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/105763 > > Okay, first off, let's notice that this article was written for NT 3.1, eh? Last reviewed in 2006, that's slightly more current than you'd suggest. > They do say that NTFS will continue to be supported in > future versions of NT, as well. > > So I think saying it "works in NTFS" is pretty accurate, Big Picture-wise, don't > you? The fact that there is verbage out there that says ADS may not be supported in future file systems should have been worth a mention, link, or other such notice. That's all I'm sayin' LFS
From: Karl E. Peterson on 4 Nov 2009 15:03
Larry Serflaten wrote: > "Karl E. Peterson" <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote > >> > You might have mentioned that MS may pull the rug out, so to speak, in >> > future OS's... >> > >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/105763 >> >> Okay, first off, let's notice that this article was written for NT 3.1, eh? > > Last reviewed in 2006, that's slightly more current than you'd suggest. But the "Applies To" list gives away when it was written, as the very low number tends to corroborate >> They do say that NTFS will continue to be supported in >> future versions of NT, as well. >> >> So I think saying it "works in NTFS" is pretty accurate, Big Picture-wise, don't >> you? > > The fact that there is verbage out there that says ADS may not be supported in > future file systems should have been worth a mention, link, or other such notice. > That's all I'm sayin' Yeah, okay, I hear what you're saying. OTOH, no one has ever implied it works anywhere else, including CDFS which is also a common FS these days. And, I'm pretty sure most articles, including mine, say that the ADS "goes away" if you copy/move the file onto a non-NTFS volume. -- ..NET: It's About Trust! http://vfred.mvps.org |