Prev: turn off use of System Volume Information
Next: turn off use of System Volume Information - SystemProperties.JPG (0/1)
From: Beyond X on 12 Jul 2010 22:57 If you meant to tinker settings in device manager, I don't know how I can change the resolution numbers (aspect ratio). I just had believed that resolution numbers were predetermined at the hardware desin stage, that is, I did not know they can be changed by software (drivers) that can be downloaded afterwards. Beyond X Unknown wrote: > What happens when you manually try to update? > "Beyond X" <donotmail(a)nomail.com> wrote in message > news:4C3B7D3F.7070000(a)nomail.com... > >>Thanks a lot for information. >>My video card is Diamond Radeon HD4350 PCIe (512MB) which I purchased very >>recently and which offers several resolutions but the aspect ratio is all >>4:3. >>I ended up to install a fresh copy of XP in a new partition. For the >>videocard, I downloaded newer drivers, which indeed offered several >>resolutions corresponding to aspect ratio 16:9. Also I have the taskbar at >>its normal position (bottom of the screen) even with the highest >>resolution. >>Only problem I still have is this: My XP is SP2 and I am unable to upgrade >>to SP3 even though automatic update has been on. What am I missing? >>Thanks again to all folks from the bottom of my heart. >>BeyondX >> >> >>I thought that the aspect ratios were a design character of individual >>cards (hardware) and that the design of such a new card must have >>considered wide screen monitors like mine until I learned from you that it >>is changeable by drivers (software). So I was encouraged and visited >>Diamond's website and attempted to update drivers for this >>particular card. >> >>Beyond X wrote: >> >>>As known by many, LCD wide screen monitors show horizontally distorted >>>images (a circle appears as an ellipse). I got Samsung SyncMaster 2333 >>>(23"diagonal) in my WinXP computer mainly used for photo editing. Annoyed >>>with horrible pictures, I had to raise its resolution to the highest, >>>1920x1440, which is beyond my eyes' comfort but improves the aspect ratio >>>significantly. The problem that I now face is disappearance of the >>>Window's taskbar. I raised the screen's vertical position as high as >>>possible, but it does not make the taskbar reappear. >>>(If I lower the monitor's resolution to or below 1600x1200, the taskbar >>>reappears, but the images are distorted.) >>>Can anyone help me? > > >
From: Beyond X on 12 Jul 2010 23:20 Thanks for detailed explanation and educational instruction. Although I solved my problem by downloading updated drivers, your response enlightened my understanding how display works. Beyond X Paul wrote: > Beyond X wrote: > >> Thanks a lot for information. >> My video card is Diamond Radeon HD4350 PCIe (512MB) which I purchased >> very recently and which offers several resolutions but the aspect >> ratio is all 4:3. >> I ended up to install a fresh copy of XP in a new partition. For the >> videocard, I downloaded newer drivers, which indeed offered several >> resolutions corresponding to aspect ratio 16:9. Also I have the >> taskbar at its normal position (bottom of the screen) even with the >> highest resolution. >> Only problem I still have is this: My XP is SP2 and I am unable to >> upgrade to SP3 even though automatic update has been on. What am I >> missing? >> Thanks again to all folks from the bottom of my heart. >> BeyondX >> >> >> I thought that the aspect ratios were a design character of individual >> cards (hardware) and that the design of such a new card must have >> considered wide screen monitors like mine until I learned from you >> that it is changeable by drivers (software). So I was encouraged and >> visited Diamond's website and attempted to update drivers for >> this particular card. >> > > The video resolution is fully programmable, to arbitrary X and Y. > Typical rules are, the X value must be divisible by 8, and the > Y value must be divisible by 2. The driver normally does the programming > of this, but there are other options. > > If the driver does not support the correct resolution, you have two > options. > > 1) Sometimes, the display control panel has a "custom resolution" box, > where you can add a new value. > > 2) You can use Powerstrip from entechtaiwan.com . > > http://www.entechtaiwan.com/util/ps.shtm > > 3) Using a new driver (which worked for you). > > If the monitor is 16:9, then for a circle to be a circle, > the video card resolution choice must also be in a ratio of > 16:9. > > In some cases, the X_offset and Y_offset values for > the video image, need to be adjusted, for the image to be > centered on the monitor screen. As an example, if I boot > a Linux CD, the image is offset a bit from the proper > position. The clock in the corner of the screen, isn't fully > visible, because of the offset error. If I install the > Nvidia Linux (tainted) driver, the offsets to the edges > of the screen are perfect. The display control panel > of an OS, may also offer adjustments for positional offset. > > For weird resolution choices, sometimes the video card > will fill unused regions with "black bars", and there > may be an option such as "preserve aspect ratio" or the like. > I don't recommend such a setting - on my computer here, > that resulted in the LCD monitor on-screen display reporting > "out of range" for the video output, so no image at all was > rendered. YMMV. > > Paul
From: Beyond X on 13 Jul 2010 00:58 Thank you very much for advice. This problem of mine automatically solved when I installed a fresh copy of WinXP followed by downloading updated video drivers. I do not know and cannot say what was wrong in the previous settings. But I tried three different DVI cables in vain, so I do not think it was defective cables. I still am unable to upgrade from SP2 to SP3 despite repeated reboots with automatic update turned on. Robert Kochem wrote: > Beyond X wrote: > > >>Thanks for suggestion. This brings up another problem I have to ask for >>a solution about. For unknown reason(s) the DVI-I or DVI-D connection >>does not work in my system, that is, when connection to the monitor is >>switched to DVI, the monitor shows blank/black screen as if a monitor is >>not connected to the computer (WinXP Home SP2). > > > May be the DVI cable is defect or your Monitor misinterprets the signal. My > old graphics card used to send a signal with a refresh rate of ~59.9999Hz. > If screws on the DVI connectors were not 100% tighten the Monitor did not > display anything because the minimum refresh rate supported is 60Hz... > > Robert
From: Bob I on 13 Jul 2010 08:21 Beyond X wrote: > Thank you very much for advice. > This problem of mine automatically solved when I installed a fresh copy > of WinXP followed by downloading updated video drivers. I do not know > and cannot say what was wrong in the previous settings. But I tried > three different DVI cables in vain, so I do not think it was defective > cables. > I still am unable to upgrade from SP2 to SP3 despite repeated reboots > with automatic update turned on. > How to obtain the latest Windows XP service pack http://support.microsoft.com/kb/322389
From: Unknown on 13 Jul 2010 09:43 What I meant by manually updating is: Go to www.microsoft.com search for SP3 and download and install it. "Beyond X" <donotmail(a)nomail.com> wrote in message news:4C3BD62A.9010900(a)nomail.com... > If you meant to tinker settings in device manager, I don't know how I can > change the resolution numbers (aspect ratio). I just had believed that > resolution numbers were predetermined at the hardware desin stage, that > is, I did not know they can be changed by software (drivers) that can be > downloaded afterwards. > Beyond X > > Unknown wrote: >> What happens when you manually try to update? >> "Beyond X" <donotmail(a)nomail.com> wrote in message >> news:4C3B7D3F.7070000(a)nomail.com... >> >>>Thanks a lot for information. >>>My video card is Diamond Radeon HD4350 PCIe (512MB) which I purchased >>>very recently and which offers several resolutions but the aspect ratio >>>is all 4:3. >>>I ended up to install a fresh copy of XP in a new partition. For the >>>videocard, I downloaded newer drivers, which indeed offered several >>>resolutions corresponding to aspect ratio 16:9. Also I have the taskbar >>>at its normal position (bottom of the screen) even with the highest >>>resolution. >>>Only problem I still have is this: My XP is SP2 and I am unable to >>>upgrade to SP3 even though automatic update has been on. What am I >>>missing? >>>Thanks again to all folks from the bottom of my heart. >>>BeyondX >>> >>> >>>I thought that the aspect ratios were a design character of individual >>>cards (hardware) and that the design of such a new card must have >>>considered wide screen monitors like mine until I learned from you that >>>it is changeable by drivers (software). So I was encouraged and visited >>>Diamond's website and attempted to update drivers for this >>>particular card. >>> >>>Beyond X wrote: >>> >>>>As known by many, LCD wide screen monitors show horizontally distorted >>>>images (a circle appears as an ellipse). I got Samsung SyncMaster 2333 >>>>(23"diagonal) in my WinXP computer mainly used for photo editing. >>>>Annoyed with horrible pictures, I had to raise its resolution to the >>>>highest, 1920x1440, which is beyond my eyes' comfort but improves the >>>>aspect ratio significantly. The problem that I now face is disappearance >>>>of the Window's taskbar. I raised the screen's vertical position as high >>>>as possible, but it does not make the taskbar reappear. >>>>(If I lower the monitor's resolution to or below 1600x1200, the taskbar >>>>reappears, but the images are distorted.) >>>>Can anyone help me? >> >>
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: turn off use of System Volume Information Next: turn off use of System Volume Information - SystemProperties.JPG (0/1) |