Tcl-URL - does memory fail me?
in [TCL]
|
Prev: want to call a tcl scrpt from vb.net
Next: Strings and lists and scripts, oh my! (was: file unsplit?)
From: Larry W. Virden on 11 Sep 2009 12:29 On Sep 11, 6:44 am, Helmut Giese <hgi...(a)ratiosoft.com> wrote: > Hello out there, > I could swear that yesterday's Tcl-URL contained a mention of tkpath - > but today I don't see it. > Did the posting change (in some mysterious way)? Is it me? > Please someone tell me that my memory is not all that bad. In the Tcl-URL! for Sep 10, there is a reference to tkpath: tkpath now has [surface]: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.tcl/browse_thread/thread/ea012238b496baa6/
From: Larry W. Virden on 11 Sep 2009 12:31 On Sep 11, 12:29 pm, "Larry W. Virden" <lvir...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Sep 11, 6:44 am, Helmut Giese <hgi...(a)ratiosoft.com> wrote: > > > Hello out there, > > I could swear that yesterday's Tcl-URL contained a mention of tkpath - > > but today I don't see it. > > Did the posting change (in some mysterious way)? Is it me? > > Please someone tell me that my memory is not all that bad. > > In the Tcl-URL! for Sep 10, there is a reference to tkpath: > > tkpath now has [surface]: > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.tcl/browse_thread/thread/ea0... Interestingly enough, the Tcl-URL! I see in my mailbox from Sept 10 is different from the one posted here on the newsgroup. The one in my mailbox begins like this. One or the other may have been mis-posted... Delivered-To: lvirden(a)gmail.com Received: by 10.151.116.12 with SMTP id t12cs28695ybm; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:49:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.94.2 with SMTP id r2mr1731447agb.84.1221065345303; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:49:05 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <claird(a)lairds.us> Received: from smtp.phaseit.net (smtp.phaseit.net [66.90.67.103]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 9si12242995agc. 31.2008.09.10.09.49.05; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:49:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of claird(a)lairds.us designates 66.90.67.103 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.90.67.103; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of claird(a)lairds.us designates 66.90.67.103 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=claird(a)lairds.us Received: from claird by smtp.phaseit.net with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from <claird(a)lairds.us>) id 1KdSsL-0007wP-1A for lvirden(a)gmail.com; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:49:05 +0000 Newsgroups: comp.lang.tcl Subject: Tcl-URL! - weekly Tcl news and links (Sep 10) From: Cameron Laird <tcl-url(a)phaseit.net> To: "Tcl-URL distribution" :; Summary: Distribution: Keywords: Cc: Message-Id: <E1KdSsL-0007wP-1A(a)smtp.phaseit.net> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:49:05 +0000 QOTW: "Basically the stubs/starkit thing is the Tcl way to do the same thing OS X Frameworks and App Bundles do in a cross platform way." - Michael Schlenk "I've had odd experiences with native dialogue[s] on Windows, and it always came down to some random shell extension that is magically invoked in the background. Usually adobe acrobat reader, it seems." - WL http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.tcl/msg/4aa6a2004aceeb32 Well, *should* Linux distributions have Tcl threads enabled? It's far from an easy question: understand, for example, that thread- enablement generally *decreases* performance: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.tcl/browse_thread/thread/805731c32f53c4b7/ Please be aware that conscientious effort has the potential to affect real distributions. Bryan Oakley makes the case for support of a simple HTML widget, 'midst a larger discussion that touches on Webkit, Gecko, style, ...: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.tcl/browse_thread/thread/1c80ed7c30ac9c27/ tkpath now has [surface]: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.tcl/browse_thread/thread/ea012238b496baa6/
From: Helmut Giese on 11 Sep 2009 13:12 Thanks Larry, you saved my day - I don't imagine mysterious things on clt. So apparently I saw the Tcl-URL you received per mail here on clt and coming back later I - like everybody else right now - see a different one. Best regards Helmut Giese On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:31:29 -0700 (PDT), "Larry W. Virden" <lvirden(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Sep 11, 12:29�pm, "Larry W. Virden" <lvir...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sep 11, 6:44�am, Helmut Giese <hgi...(a)ratiosoft.com> wrote: >> >> > Hello out there, >> > I could swear that yesterday's Tcl-URL contained a mention of tkpath - >> > but today I don't see it. >> > Did the posting change (in some mysterious way)? Is it me? >> > Please someone tell me that my memory is not all that bad. >> >> In the Tcl-URL! for Sep 10, there is a reference to tkpath: >> >> � �tkpath now has [surface]: >> � � � �http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.tcl/browse_thread/thread/ea0... > >Interestingly enough, the Tcl-URL! I see in my mailbox from Sept 10 is >different from the one posted here on the newsgroup. >The one in my mailbox begins like this. One or the other may have been >mis-posted... > > > >Delivered-To: lvirden(a)gmail.com >Received: by 10.151.116.12 with SMTP id t12cs28695ybm; > Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:49:05 -0700 (PDT) >Received: by 10.90.94.2 with SMTP id r2mr1731447agb.84.1221065345303; > Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:49:05 -0700 (PDT) >Return-Path: <claird(a)lairds.us> >Received: from smtp.phaseit.net (smtp.phaseit.net [66.90.67.103]) > by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 9si12242995agc. >31.2008.09.10.09.49.05; > Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:49:05 -0700 (PDT) >Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of claird(a)lairds.us designates >66.90.67.103 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.90.67.103; >Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of >claird(a)lairds.us designates 66.90.67.103 as permitted sender) >smtp.mail=claird(a)lairds.us >Received: from claird by smtp.phaseit.net with local (Exim 4.62) > (envelope-from <claird(a)lairds.us>) > id 1KdSsL-0007wP-1A > for lvirden(a)gmail.com; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:49:05 +0000 >Newsgroups: comp.lang.tcl >Subject: Tcl-URL! - weekly Tcl news and links (Sep 10) >From: Cameron Laird <tcl-url(a)phaseit.net> >To: "Tcl-URL distribution" :; >Summary: >Distribution: >Keywords: >Cc: >Message-Id: <E1KdSsL-0007wP-1A(a)smtp.phaseit.net> >Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:49:05 +0000 > >QOTW: "Basically the stubs/starkit thing is the Tcl way to do the >same thing >OS X Frameworks and App Bundles do in a cross platform way." - Michael >Schlenk > >"I've had odd experiences with native dialogue[s] on Windows, and it >always >came down to some random shell extension that is magically invoked in >the >background. Usually adobe acrobat reader, it seems." - WL > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.tcl/msg/4aa6a2004aceeb32 > > > Well, *should* Linux distributions have Tcl threads enabled? It's > far from an easy question: understand, for example, that thread- > enablement generally *decreases* performance: > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.tcl/browse_thread/thread/805731c32f53c4b7/ > Please be aware that conscientious effort has the potential to >affect > real distributions. > > Bryan Oakley makes the case for support of a simple HTML widget, > 'midst a larger discussion that touches on Webkit, Gecko, style, > ...: > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.tcl/browse_thread/thread/1c80ed7c30ac9c27/ > > tkpath now has [surface]: > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.tcl/browse_thread/thread/ea012238b496baa6/
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: want to call a tcl scrpt from vb.net Next: Strings and lists and scripts, oh my! (was: file unsplit?) |