From: Hammy on
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:41:20 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje(a)yahoo.com> wrote:


>>The THS422X may be overkill but off the top of my head....
>>
>>http://focus.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/ths4222.pdf
>
>Yes that is nice, but also consumes quite a bit of current... that I do not have.
>
>Thank you.

Yea the THS422X IS a bit of a brute;-)

I went through my opamp data sheets and found this.4.3mA/ch
..Availiable in a quad.Low power shutdown mode.

http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/opa727.html

The TLV2372 Is a decent low power opamp but its slow 2.4 V/us






From: Jan Panteltje on
n a sunny day (Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:56:52 -0500) it happened "Tim Williams"
<tmoranwms(a)charter.net> wrote in <hpvmt7$8fg$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>:

>TLV2372?


That looks good.
It is just fast enough and has a 4 in a package version
And I can but it here and it is in stock.
one for ch 1, one for ch 2, one for trigger, and one for DC shift perhaps.


>Kind of an LM358 including the top rail, with lower current... response
>about the same. Bandwidth isn't "low" but maybe it's not 10V/us.
>
>The FET follower will work if you add a trimpot and another JFET to
>compensate it. If you don't want a trimpot and the extra 4 transistors, you
>might as well use an op-amp. Fewer pins for sure.
>
>Tim

Yes, need a lot more transistors then, more space, more expensive, I like this opamp,
it does not have all those weird curves some of the others have.
I came up with OP482 myself this afternoon, but that is more expensive.
The TLV2374 quad goes for about 1 Euro here.

From: Jan Panteltje on
On a sunny day (Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:21:36 +1000) it happened David Eather
<eather(a)tpg.com.au> wrote in <lYCdnfzwxbsp-V7WnZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d(a)supernews.com>:

>On 12/04/2010 9:33 PM, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>> Technical question about good low power rail to rail opamp.
>> I published 'scope_pic'
>> http://panteltje.com/panteltje/pic/scope_pic/
>> and am getting questions as 'to where to connect the input etc..'.
>>
>> The question is how to make a 1 MOhm, few pF, input with a bandwidth of about 1MHz,
>> with as few components as possible, that also creates a +2V DC offset
>> (to get the ADC midrange and allow negative signals),
>>
>> Now My first idea was to make a JFET input, tried something in spice like this:
>> ftp://panteltje.com/pub/fet.gif
>>
>> There is a lot of spread in individual jfets, and the only negative voltage
>> available is a tap of the -8 V from a MAX232.
>>
>> So that leaves opamps, and the ones I found (5V rail to rail)
>> have either low bandwidth, bad slew rates,
>> incredible distortion, or all of those at the same time.
>>
>> So I am looking for a decent quad 5V to 12 supply opamp with low current draw,
>> only needs to drive a PIC input, say 10k in 25 pF, with low distortion, high
>> gain, slew rate> 10V us, voltage swing to very near the positive supply,
>> input impedance 00, input cap< 10 pF.
>>
>> I looked at LMC6036, some others, but no good.
>> Any ideas?
>> So it is for the scope input amp.
>
>Why are you stuck with only a +5v rail. Can't you use any voltage rails
>you like for the op amp and shift the output and alter the gain
>independently? (and if you need to add some diodes to keep the output
>clamped between 0 - 5 volts)

I am using -8V from a MAX 232 output as negaive rail :-)
and possibly the +8 from an other output as positive rail.
That solution is hereby copyrighed.
hehe

From: Jan Panteltje on
On a sunny day (Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:26:02 -0400) it happened Hammy
<spam(a)spam.com> wrote in <ifo6s5t2rt8pgooodajrie6k4urh1mlv13(a)4ax.com>:

>On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:41:20 GMT, Jan Panteltje
><pNaonStpealmtje(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>The THS422X may be overkill but off the top of my head....
>>>
>>>http://focus.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/ths4222.pdf
>>
>>Yes that is nice, but also consumes quite a bit of current... that I do not have.
>>
>>Thank you.
>
>Yea the THS422X IS a bit of a brute;-)
>
>I went through my opamp data sheets and found this.4.3mA/ch
>.Availiable in a quad.Low power shutdown mode.
>
>http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/opa727.html
>
>The TLV2372 Is a decent low power opamp but its slow 2.4 V/us

OK, but those are +/-5V, and I want to run from +5 -8.
From: David Eather on
On 13/04/2010 4:57 AM, Jan Panteltje wrote:
> On a sunny day (Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:21:36 +1000) it happened David Eather
> <eather(a)tpg.com.au> wrote in<lYCdnfzwxbsp-V7WnZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d(a)supernews.com>:
>
>> On 12/04/2010 9:33 PM, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>>> Technical question about good low power rail to rail opamp.
>>> I published 'scope_pic'
>>> http://panteltje.com/panteltje/pic/scope_pic/
>>> and am getting questions as 'to where to connect the input etc..'.
>>>
>>> The question is how to make a 1 MOhm, few pF, input with a bandwidth of about 1MHz,
>>> with as few components as possible, that also creates a +2V DC offset
>>> (to get the ADC midrange and allow negative signals),
>>>
>>> Now My first idea was to make a JFET input, tried something in spice like this:
>>> ftp://panteltje.com/pub/fet.gif
>>>
>>> There is a lot of spread in individual jfets, and the only negative voltage
>>> available is a tap of the -8 V from a MAX232.
>>>
>>> So that leaves opamps, and the ones I found (5V rail to rail)
>>> have either low bandwidth, bad slew rates,
>>> incredible distortion, or all of those at the same time.
>>>
>>> So I am looking for a decent quad 5V to 12 supply opamp with low current draw,
>>> only needs to drive a PIC input, say 10k in 25 pF, with low distortion, high
>>> gain, slew rate> 10V us, voltage swing to very near the positive supply,
>>> input impedance 00, input cap< 10 pF.
>>>
>>> I looked at LMC6036, some others, but no good.
>>> Any ideas?
>>> So it is for the scope input amp.
>>
>> Why are you stuck with only a +5v rail. Can't you use any voltage rails
>> you like for the op amp and shift the output and alter the gain
>> independently? (and if you need to add some diodes to keep the output
>> clamped between 0 - 5 volts)
>
> I am using -8V from a MAX 232 output as negaive rail :-)
> and possibly the +8 from an other output as positive rail.
> That solution is hereby copyrighed.
> hehe
>

Sorry - a few published PIC programmers have beaten you to that idea.