From: Jeff Rubard on 28 Jan 2010 21:03 Or, a Note on the "axiomatic semantics" of Unstructured Jumps ⥠There, I said it. What did I say? A falsehood, for the symbol above denotes 'bottom' *or* 'falsum' - a 'zero-place' logical operator that 'denotes' something false. How it /do/ that? Like this: the falsum is defined by its 'suitability' for forcing an application of *ex falso quodlibetal*, "from a falsehood one draws any conclusions one likes". What of it, as regards Goto in the *langages divers* in which it appear-ez? Actually, the logical role of 'falsum' very precisely "maps" or /stipulates/ the character of the "unstructured jump": As Hoare's programming semantics gives triadic "before-and-after-and- during" conditions for change of state in 'imperative' programming languages, the unstructured jump GOTO [BASIC version] is "rendered" by falsum or an *Ersatz* for it. However, what Kemeny knew Stroustrup put asunder, and the *logica* of Dijkstra's imprecation of the thing is best derived from a consideration of C style as regards goto: and its uses. C goto is not a piece of *mechaniqué* used to implement the most "machinic" high-level construct for abstract-machine change: instead, it sets up an "infinite loop" that the programmer *definitely intends* never to cease if the program has *proper operation*. How-ever, the point is more "multifarious" than these non-koans of 'there-you-do-it-now-you-can't' might *indicate*: in fact, as "ex falso" prompts the *risorgimento* of non-contradictory groups of statements, /falsum-Goto/ suggests that *there is more in heaven and earth than in your momentary programming philosophy*: in fact, conditions of *Informatik* are more congenial than you knew at program's /authorship/ and data-crunching can continue apace without one local "subroutine" or /paradigm/. Something to think about. JDR
|
Pages: 1 Prev: POSTDOC JOB ANNOUNCEMENT Next: *Tecnica*: Your Major Source For "Book" [Cue "Alicia"] |