Test
in [Logic]
|
Prev: LWalk, do you see why Iain Davidson has a error filled fake proof? #4.15 Correcting Math
Next: misleading idea of contradiction proofs; Twin Primes must have a Euclid type proof #4.17 Correcting Math
From: herbzet on 25 Jul 2010 19:47 Jim Burns wrote: > herbzet wrote: > > Marshall wrote: > >> herbzet wrote: > > > >>> Nothing to see here, move along. > >> > >> Consider me moved! I'm resolved on this. > >> It is already forgotten. > > > > What part of "beat it" don't you understand? > > Wait! > What am I supposed to ignore? > > I mean, what if I get it wrong? > The possibilities are ominous. Just pick something, for chrissake.
From: herbzet on 25 Jul 2010 19:48
Marshall wrote: > herbzet wrote: > > Marshall wrote: > > > herbzet wrote: > > > > Nothing to see here, move along. > > > > > Consider me moved! I'm resolved on this. It is already forgotten. > > > > What part of "beat it" don't you understand? > > Well, most of the lyrics, actually. The chorus starts simply enough: > > Beat it > Beat it > > and then what? The next line is unintelligible. And > after that he says something about being "funky" > but I can't tell what it is. > > How then am I to become sufficiently funky when the > libretto is thus inscrutable? > > Marshall > > PS. Don't even get me started on "Billy Jean." Step away from the keyboard, please. -- |